AMD Radeon R7 250 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2100M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 250 and NVIDIA Quadro K2100M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 250
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
- Around 66% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 7533 vs 4541
- Around 63% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 20.161 vs 12.383
- Around 50% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.655 vs 1.107
- Around 38% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 30.046 vs 21.761
- 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 96.934 vs 40.703
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 8 October 2013 vs 23 July 2013 |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 7533 vs 4541 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 20.161 vs 12.383 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.655 vs 1.107 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.046 vs 21.761 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 96.934 vs 40.703 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K2100M
- Around 43% higher texture fill rate: 32.02 GTexel / s vs 22.4 GTexel / s
- Around 50% higher pipelines: 576 vs 384
- Around 7% better floating-point performance: 768.4 gflops vs 716.8 gflops
- Around 36% lower typical power consumption: 55 Watt vs 75 Watt
- 2.6x more memory clock speed: 3008 MHz vs 1150 MHz
- Around 29% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1361 vs 1055
- Around 18% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 358.892 vs 304.279
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2294 vs 2179
- Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3605 vs 3170
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2294 vs 2179
- Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3605 vs 3170
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 32.02 GTexel / s vs 22.4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 576 vs 384 |
Floating-point performance | 768.4 gflops vs 716.8 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 3008 MHz vs 1150 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1361 vs 1055 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 358.892 vs 304.279 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2294 vs 2179 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3605 vs 3170 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3362 vs 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2294 vs 2179 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3605 vs 3170 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3362 vs 3356 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 250
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K2100M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R7 250 | NVIDIA Quadro K2100M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1055 | 1361 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 284 | 284 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 7533 | 4541 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 20.161 | 12.383 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 304.279 | 358.892 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.655 | 1.107 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.046 | 21.761 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 96.934 | 40.703 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2179 | 2294 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3170 | 3605 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3362 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2179 | 2294 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3170 | 3605 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3362 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R7 250 | NVIDIA Quadro K2100M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Oland | GK106 |
Design | AMD Radeon R7 200 Series | |
Launch date | 8 October 2013 | 23 July 2013 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $89 | $84.95 |
Place in performance rating | 1109 | 1110 |
Price now | $78.34 | $159.99 |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Value for money (0-100) | 27.62 | 10.91 |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz | |
Floating-point performance | 716.8 gflops | 768.4 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 576 |
Stream Processors | 384 | |
Texture fill rate | 22.4 GTexel / s | 32.02 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 55 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | 2,540 million |
Core clock speed | 667 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | No outputs |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Display Port | 1.2 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | MXM-A (3.0) |
Length | 168 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | N / A | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | 48.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1150 MHz | 3008 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 / GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
AppAcceleration | ||
CrossFire | ||
DDMA audio | ||
FreeSync | ||
3D Vision Pro | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Display Management | ||
Optimus |