AMD Radeon R7 250 versus NVIDIA Quadro K2100M

Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon R7 250 and NVIDIA Quadro K2100M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

AMD Radeon R7 250

versus

NVIDIA Quadro K2100M

Différences

Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R7 250

La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 mois plus tard
Environ 1% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 286 versus 282
Environ 58% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 7220 versus 4571
Environ 63% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 20.161 versus 12.383
Environ 50% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.655 versus 1.107
Environ 38% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 30.046 versus 21.761
2.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 96.934 versus 40.703

Caractéristiques
Date de sortie	8 October 2013 versus 23 July 2013
Référence
PassMark - G2D Mark	286 versus 282
Geekbench - OpenCL	7220 versus 4571
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	20.161 versus 12.383
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	1.655 versus 1.107
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	30.046 versus 21.761
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	96.934 versus 40.703

Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro K2100M

Environ 43% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 32.02 GTexel / s versus 22.4 GTexel / s
Environ 50% de pipelines plus haut: 576 versus 384
Environ 7% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 768.4 gflops versus 716.8 gflops
Environ 36% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 55 Watt versus 75 Watt
2.6x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 3008 MHz versus 1150 MHz
Environ 27% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1354 versus 1065
Environ 18% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 358.892 versus 304.279
Environ 5% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2294 versus 2179
Environ 14% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3605 versus 3170
Environ 5% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2294 versus 2179
Environ 14% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3605 versus 3170

Caractéristiques
Taux de remplissage de la texture	32.02 GTexel / s versus 22.4 GTexel / s
Pipelines	576 versus 384
Performance á point flottant	768.4 gflops versus 716.8 gflops
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	55 Watt versus 75 Watt
Vitesse de mémoire	3008 MHz versus 1150 MHz
Référence
PassMark - G3D Mark	1354 versus 1065
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	358.892 versus 304.279
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	2294 versus 2179
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3605 versus 3170
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3362 versus 3356
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	2294 versus 2179
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3605 versus 3170
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3362 versus 3356

Comparer les références

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 250
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K2100M

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

1065

1354

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

286

282

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

7220

4571

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

20.161

12.383

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

304.279

358.892

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1.655

1.107

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

30.046

21.761

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

96.934

40.703

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2179

2294

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3170

3605

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3356

3362

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2179

2294

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3170

3605

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3356

3362

Nom	AMD Radeon R7 250	NVIDIA Quadro K2100M
PassMark - G3D Mark	1065	1354
PassMark - G2D Mark	286	282
Geekbench - OpenCL	7220	4571
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	20.161	12.383
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	304.279	358.892
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	1.655	1.107
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	30.046	21.761
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	96.934	40.703
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	2179	2294
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3170	3605
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3356	3362
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	2179	2294
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3170	3605
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3356	3362
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	0	0

Comparer les caractéristiques

	AMD Radeon R7 250	NVIDIA Quadro K2100M
Essentiel
Architecture	GCN 1.0	Kepler
Nom de code	Oland	GK106
Conception	AMD Radeon R7 200 Series
Date de sortie	8 October 2013	23 July 2013
Prix de sortie (MSRP)	$89	$84.95
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance	1107	1108
Prix maintenant	$78.34	$159.99
Genre	Desktop	Mobile workstation
Valeur pour le prix (0-100)	27.62	10.91
Infos techniques
Vitesse augmenté	1050 MHz
Performance á point flottant	716.8 gflops	768.4 gflops
Processus de fabrication	28 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	384	576
Stream Processors	384
Taux de remplissage de la texture	22.4 GTexel / s	32.02 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	75 Watt	55 Watt
Compte de transistor	1,040 million	2,540 million
Vitesse du noyau		667 MHz
Sorties et ports de vidéo
Connecteurs d’écran	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA	No outputs
Soutien de DisplayPort
Soutien de Dual-link DVI
HDMI
VGA
Display Port		1.2
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences
Soutien de bus	PCIe 3.0
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	MXM-A (3.0)
Longeur	168 mm
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires	N / A
Taille du laptop		medium sized
Soutien API
DirectX	12	12
OpenGL	4.5	4.5
Shader Model		5
Vulkan
Mémoire
RAM maximale	2 GB	2 GB
Bande passante de la mémoire	72 GB/s	48.0 GB / s
Largeur du bus mémoire	128 Bit	128 Bit
Vitesse de mémoire	1150 MHz	3008 MHz
Genre de mémoire	DDR3 / GDDR5	GDDR5
Mémoire partagé	0	0
Technologies
AppAcceleration
CrossFire
DDMA audio
FreeSync
3D Vision Pro
Mosaic
nView Display Management
Optimus