AMD Radeon R7 250E vs ATI Radeon HD 5470
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 250E and ATI Radeon HD 5470 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 250E
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 23% higher core clock speed: 800 MHz vs 650 MHz
- 4.9x more texture fill rate: 25.6 GTexel / s vs 5.2 GTexel / s
- 6.4x more pipelines: 512 vs 80
- 7.9x better floating-point performance: 819.2 gflops vs 104.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
- 5.6x more memory clock speed: 4500 MHz vs 800 MHz
- 3.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3698 vs 960
- Around 89% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3355 vs 1771
- 3.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3698 vs 960
- Around 89% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3355 vs 1771
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 20 December 2013 vs 13 February 2012 |
Core clock speed | 800 MHz vs 650 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 25.6 GTexel / s vs 5.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 512 vs 80 |
Floating-point performance | 819.2 gflops vs 104.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 512 MB |
Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz vs 800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3698 vs 960 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 vs 1771 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3698 vs 960 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 vs 1771 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 5470
- 2.9x lower typical power consumption: 19 Watt vs 55 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt vs 55 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 250E
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 5470
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R7 250E | ATI Radeon HD 5470 |
---|---|---|
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 21.562 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 582.073 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.2 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 38.669 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 98.052 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2873 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3698 | 960 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 1771 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2873 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3698 | 960 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 1771 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 268 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 298 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R7 250E | ATI Radeon HD 5470 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | Cape Verde | Cedar |
Launch date | 20 December 2013 | 13 February 2012 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $109 | |
Place in performance rating | 1075 | 1077 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 800 MHz | 650 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 819.2 gflops | 104.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 512 | 80 |
Texture fill rate | 25.6 GTexel / s | 5.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt | 19 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,500 million | 292 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 168 mm | 170 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 72 GB / s | 6.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | 800 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |