AMD Radeon R7 350 vs AMD Radeon R7 250

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 350 and AMD Radeon R7 250 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 350

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 8 month(s) later
• Around 14% higher texture fill rate: 25.6 GTexel / s vs 22.4 GTexel / s
• Around 33% higher pipelines: 512 vs 384
• Around 14% better floating-point performance: 819.2 gflops vs 716.8 gflops
• Around 36% lower typical power consumption: 55 Watt vs 75 Watt
• 3.9x more memory clock speed: 4500 MHz vs 1150 MHz
• Around 3% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 7787 vs 7525
• Around 27% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 25.508 vs 20.161
• 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 647.813 vs 304.279
• Around 64% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.72 vs 1.655
• Around 48% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 44.6 vs 30.046
• Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 109.558 vs 96.934

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 250

• Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2179 vs 2072
• Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3170 vs 3122
• Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2179 vs 2072
• Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3170 vs 3122

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 350
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 250

Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	7787 7525
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	25.508 20.161
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	647.813 304.279
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2.72 1.655
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	44.6 30.046
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	109.558 96.934
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2072 2179
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3122 3170
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 3356
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2072 2179
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3122 3170
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 3356

Compare specifications (specs)