AMD Radeon R7 350 vs ATI Radeon HD 5770

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 350 and ATI Radeon HD 5770 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 350

• Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 8 month(s) later
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• Around 96% lower typical power consumption: 55 Watt vs 108 Watt
• 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
• 2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 25.508 vs 9.373
• Around 41% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 647.813 vs 459.025
• 3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.72 vs 0.906
• Around 65% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 44.6 vs 27.022
• 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 109.558 vs 48.793
• Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3122 vs 2673
• Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 2799
• Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3122 vs 2673
• Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 2799

Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 5770

• Around 6% higher core clock speed: 850 MHz vs 800 MHz
• Around 33% higher texture fill rate: 34.0 GTexel / s vs 25.6 GTexel / s
• Around 56% higher pipelines: 800 vs 512
• Around 66% better floating-point performance: 1,360.0 gflops vs 819.2 gflops
• Around 7% higher memory clock speed: 4800 MHz vs 4500 MHz
• Around 35% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 10495 vs 7787
• Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2636 vs 2072
• Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2636 vs 2072

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 350
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 5770

Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	7787 10495
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	25.508 9.373
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	647.813 459.025
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2.72 0.906
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	44.6 27.022
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	109.558 48.793
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2072 2636
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3122 2673
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 2799
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2072 2636
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3122 2673
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 2799

Compare specifications (specs)