AMD Radeon R7 350 vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 350 and NVIDIA Quadro 2000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 350
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 28% higher core clock speed: 800 MHz vs 625 MHz
- Around 28% higher texture fill rate: 25.6 GTexel / s vs 20 GTexel / s
- 2.7x more pipelines: 512 vs 192
- Around 71% better floating-point performance: 819.2 gflops vs 480.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 13% lower typical power consumption: 55 Watt vs 62 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 73% higher memory clock speed: 4500 MHz vs 2600 MHz
- 2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 7787 vs 3879
- 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 25.508 vs 10.229
- 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 647.813 vs 258.26
- 3.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.72 vs 0.885
- 3.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 44.6 vs 13.688
- 5.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 109.558 vs 19.02
- Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2072 vs 1600
- Around 86% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3122 vs 1682
- Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 2668
- Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2072 vs 1600
- Around 86% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3122 vs 1682
- Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 2668
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 6 July 2016 vs 24 December 2010 |
| Core clock speed | 800 MHz vs 625 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 25.6 GTexel / s vs 20 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 512 vs 192 |
| Floating-point performance | 819.2 gflops vs 480.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt vs 62 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz vs 2600 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 7787 vs 3879 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 25.508 vs 10.229 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 647.813 vs 258.26 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.72 vs 0.885 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 44.6 vs 13.688 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 109.558 vs 19.02 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2072 vs 1600 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3122 vs 1682 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 2668 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2072 vs 1600 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3122 vs 1682 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 2668 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 350
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 2000
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon R7 350 | NVIDIA Quadro 2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 7787 | 3879 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 25.508 | 10.229 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 647.813 | 258.26 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.72 | 0.885 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 44.6 | 13.688 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 109.558 | 19.02 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2072 | 1600 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3122 | 1682 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 2668 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2072 | 1600 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3122 | 1682 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 2668 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 947 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 303 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon R7 350 | NVIDIA Quadro 2000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Fermi |
| Code name | Cape Verde | GF106 |
| Launch date | 6 July 2016 | 24 December 2010 |
| Place in performance rating | 1083 | 1287 |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $599 | |
| Price now | $87.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 17.65 | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 800 MHz | 625 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 819.2 gflops | 480.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 512 | 192 |
| Texture fill rate | 25.6 GTexel / s | 20 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt | 62 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,500 million | 1,170 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 168 mm | 178 mm |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 72 GB / s | 41.6 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | 2600 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |

