AMD Radeon R7 360 vs ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 360 and ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 360
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- 7.9x more texture fill rate: 50.4 GTexel / s vs 6.4 GTexel / s
- 6.4x more pipelines: 768 vs 120
- 8.4x better floating-point performance: 1,613 gflops vs 192 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 65 nm
- 8x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 256 MB
- 11x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3125 vs 283
- Around 38% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 511 vs 371
- Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 4147 vs 3695
- Around 97% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 1701
- Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 4147 vs 3695
- Around 97% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 1701
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 18 June 2015 vs 28 June 2007 |
| Texture fill rate | 50.4 GTexel / s vs 6.4 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 768 vs 120 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,613 gflops vs 192 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 65 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 256 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3125 vs 283 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 511 vs 371 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 4147 vs 3695 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 1701 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 4147 vs 3695 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 1701 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT
- 2x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 100 Watt
- 2.1x more memory clock speed: 2200 MHz vs 1050 MHz
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 100 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 2200 MHz vs 1050 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 360
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon R7 360 | ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3125 | 283 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 511 | 371 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 16433 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 38.068 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 819.203 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.386 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 58.285 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 188.858 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4799 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 4147 | 3695 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 1701 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4799 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 4147 | 3695 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 1701 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1402 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon R7 360 | ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | TeraScale |
| Code name | Tobago | RV630 |
| Design | AMD Radeon R7 300 Series | |
| Launch date | 18 June 2015 | 28 June 2007 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $109 | $199 |
| Place in performance rating | 646 | 643 |
| Price now | $146.65 | |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 29.24 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1000 MHz | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,613 gflops | 192 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 65 nm |
| Pipelines | 768 | 120 |
| Stream Processors | 768 | |
| Texture fill rate | 50.4 GTexel / s | 6.4 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Transistor count | 2,080 million | 390 million |
| Core clock speed | 800 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Number of Eyefinity displays | 6 | |
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Length | 165 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1 x 6-pin | None |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 10.0 |
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 256 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 112 GB/s | 35.2 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1050 MHz | 2200 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR4 |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| DDMA audio | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon R7 360 with others
AMDRadeon R7 360 vs
ATIMobility Radeon X2300
AMDRadeon R7 360 vs
ATIRadeon HD 2600 XT
AMDRadeon R7 360 vs
AMDRadeon R7 260X
AMDRadeon R7 360 vs
AMDFirePro M5100
AMDRadeon R7 360 vs
AMDFirePro W5100
AMDRadeon R7 360 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook)
