AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM vs ATI Radeon HD 5970
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM and ATI Radeon HD 5970 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 28% higher core clock speed: 925 MHz vs 725 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 4.6x lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 300 Watt
- Around 13% higher memory clock speed: 4500 MHz vs 4000 MHz
- Around 27% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 530 vs 416
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3666 vs 3454
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 3213
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3666 vs 3454
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 3213
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 30 June 2016 vs 18 November 2009 |
Core clock speed | 925 MHz vs 725 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 300 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz vs 4000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 530 vs 416 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3666 vs 3454 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3213 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3666 vs 3454 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3213 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 5970
- 8.7x more texture fill rate: 2x 58.0 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 29.6 GTexel / s
- 6.3x more pipelines: 2x 1600 vs 512
- 4.9x better floating-point performance: 2x 2,320.0 gflops vs 947.2 gflops
- Around 19% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2263 vs 1901
- Around 42% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3977 vs 2809
- Around 42% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3977 vs 2809
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 2x 58.0 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 29.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2x 1600 vs 512 |
Floating-point performance | 2x 2,320.0 gflops vs 947.2 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2263 vs 1901 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3977 vs 2809 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3977 vs 2809 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 5970
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM | ATI Radeon HD 5970 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1901 | 2263 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 530 | 416 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9694 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 24.788 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 638.196 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.619 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 41.414 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 112.347 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2809 | 3977 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3666 | 3454 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3213 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2809 | 3977 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3666 | 3454 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3213 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM | ATI Radeon HD 5970 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | Cape Verde | Hemlock |
Launch date | 30 June 2016 | 18 November 2009 |
Place in performance rating | 764 | 605 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Design | ATI Radeon HD 5000 Series | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $699 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 925 MHz | 725 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 947.2 gflops | 2x 2,320.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 512 | 2x 1600 |
Texture fill rate | 29.6 GTexel / s | 2x 58.0 GTexel / s billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 300 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,500 million | 2,154 million |
Boost clock speed | 725 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x mini-DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Length | 305 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 11 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 72 GB / s | 2x 128.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 2x 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | 4000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity |