AMD Radeon R7 M260 vs AMD Radeon HD 6670

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 M260 and AMD Radeon HD 6670 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 M260

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 1 month(s) later
• Around 23% higher boost clock speed: 980 MHz vs 800 MHz
• Around 18% higher texture fill rate: 22.56 GTexel / s vs 19.2 GTexel / s
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
• 2.7x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5125 vs 1905
• 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 14.249 vs 4.861
• 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.925 vs 0.463
• Around 26% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 19.992 vs 15.918
• 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 77.895 vs 38.551

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6670

• Around 25% higher pipelines: 480 vs 384
• Around 6% better floating-point performance: 768.0 gflops vs 721.9 gflops
• Around 5% higher memory clock speed: 1050 MHz vs 1000 MHz
• Around 40% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 724 vs 517
• Around 98% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 247 vs 125
• Around 62% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 235.463 vs 145.3
• Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1564 vs 1404
• 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3260 vs 1093
• Around 96% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3348 vs 1704
• Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1564 vs 1404
• 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3260 vs 1093
• Around 96% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3348 vs 1704

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 M260
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6670

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	517 724
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	125 247
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	5125 1905
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	14.249 4.861
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	145.3 235.463
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	0.925 0.463
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	19.992 15.918
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	77.895 38.551
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1404 1564
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1093 3260
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1704 3348
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1404 1564
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1093 3260
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1704 3348

Compare specifications (specs)