AMD Radeon R7 M260 vs AMD Radeon HD 8610G
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 M260 and AMD Radeon HD 8610G videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 M260
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 76% higher core clock speed: 940 MHz vs 533 MHz
- Around 57% higher boost clock speed: 980 MHz vs 626 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 32 nm
- Around 27% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 517 vs 407
- Around 8% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 125 vs 116
- 3.5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5125 vs 1463
- Around 99% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1404 vs 707
- Around 99% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1404 vs 707
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 11 June 2014 vs 23 May 2013 |
| Core clock speed | 940 MHz vs 533 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 980 MHz vs 626 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 32 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 517 vs 407 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 125 vs 116 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5125 vs 1463 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1404 vs 707 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1404 vs 707 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8610G
- Around 71% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1868 vs 1093
- Around 97% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3350 vs 1704
- Around 71% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1868 vs 1093
- Around 97% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3350 vs 1704
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1868 vs 1093 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3350 vs 1704 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1868 vs 1093 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3350 vs 1704 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 M260
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8610G
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon R7 M260 | AMD Radeon HD 8610G |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 517 | 407 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 125 | 116 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5125 | 1463 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 14.249 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 145.3 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.925 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.992 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 77.895 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1404 | 707 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1093 | 1868 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1704 | 3350 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1404 | 707 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1093 | 1868 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1704 | 3350 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon R7 M260 | AMD Radeon HD 8610G | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Terascale 3 |
| Code name | Topaz | Richland |
| Design | AMD Radeon R7 200 Series | |
| Launch date | 11 June 2014 | 23 May 2013 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $799 | |
| Place in performance rating | 1479 | 1322 |
| Price now | $799 | |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 1.33 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 980 MHz | 626 MHz |
| Compute units | 6 | |
| Core clock speed | 940 MHz | 533 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 721.9 gflops | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 32 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
| Texture fill rate | 22.56 GTexel / s | |
| Transistor count | 3,100 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 x8 | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | medium sized |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 11 |
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 32 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz | |
| Memory type | DDR3 | |
| Shared memory | 0 | 1 |
Technologies |
||
| DualGraphics | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| HD3D | ||
| PCIe 3.0 | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| Switchable graphics | ||
| Zero Core | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon R7 M260 with others
AMDRadeon R7 M260 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 320 OEM
AMDRadeon R7 M260 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7350 OEM
AMDRadeon R7 M260 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 755M Mac Edition
AMDRadeon R7 M260 vs
IntelHD Graphics 5500
AMDRadeon R7 M260 vs
IntelHD Graphics 615
AMDRadeon R7 M260 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 1030 DDR4
