AMD Radeon R7 M260X vs AMD Radeon R9 M375X
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 M260X and AMD Radeon R9 M375X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 M260X
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 month(s) later
- Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1775 vs 1333
- Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3158 vs 2185
- Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1775 vs 1333
- Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3158 vs 2185
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 6 December 2015 vs 5 May 2015 |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1775 vs 1333 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3158 vs 2185 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1775 vs 1333 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3158 vs 2185 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M375X
- Around 49% higher core clock speed: 925 MHz vs 620 MHz
- Around 42% higher boost clock speed: 1015 MHz vs 715 MHz
- 2.4x more texture fill rate: 40.6 GTexel / s vs 17.16 GTexel / s
- Around 67% higher pipelines: 640 vs 384
- 2.4x better floating-point performance: 1,299 gflops vs 549.1 gflops
- Around 13% higher memory clock speed: 1125 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- Around 75% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1742 vs 997
- Around 88% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 315 vs 168
- Around 53% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9124 vs 5979
- Around 87% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3548 vs 1893
- Around 87% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3548 vs 1893
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 925 MHz vs 620 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1015 MHz vs 715 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 40.6 GTexel / s vs 17.16 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 640 vs 384 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,299 gflops vs 549.1 gflops |
| Memory clock speed | 1125 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1742 vs 997 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 315 vs 168 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9124 vs 5979 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3548 vs 1893 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3548 vs 1893 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 M260X
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 M375X
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon R7 M260X | AMD Radeon R9 M375X |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 997 | 1742 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 168 | 315 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5979 | 9124 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1893 | 3548 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1775 | 1333 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3158 | 2185 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1893 | 3548 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1775 | 1333 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3158 | 2185 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon R7 M260X | AMD Radeon R9 M375X | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Opal | Tropo |
| Design | AMD Radeon R7 200 Series | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series |
| Launch date | 6 December 2015 | 5 May 2015 |
| Place in performance rating | 1203 | 897 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 715 MHz | 1015 MHz |
| Compute units | 6 | 10 |
| Core clock speed | 620 MHz | 925 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 549.1 gflops | 1,299 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 640 |
| Texture fill rate | 17.16 GTexel / s | 40.6 GTexel / s |
| Transistor count | 1,040 million | 1,500 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Eyefinity | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | 2.0 | Not Listed |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 72 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz | 1125 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| DualGraphics | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| HD3D | ||
| PCIe 3.0 | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| Switchable graphics | ||
| Zero Core | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon R7 M260X with others
AMDRadeon R7 M260X vs
ATIRadeon 9800 SE
AMDRadeon R7 M260X vs
NVIDIAGeForce Go 7800 GTX
AMDRadeon R7 M260X vs
AMDRadeon HD 8670D
AMDRadeon R7 M260X vs
AMDFirePro W2100
AMDRadeon R7 M260X vs
NVIDIAGeForce 930M
AMDRadeon R7 M260X vs
AMDRadeon R5 430 OEM
