AMD Radeon R7 M260X vs NVIDIA GeForce 940M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 M260X and NVIDIA GeForce 940M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 M260X

• Videocard is newer: launch date 8 month(s) later
• 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
• Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 161 vs 154

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 940M

• Around 73% higher core clock speed: 1072 MHz vs 620 MHz
• Around 64% higher boost clock speed: 1176 MHz vs 715 MHz
• Around 64% higher texture fill rate: 28.22 GTexel / s vs 17.16 GTexel / s
• Around 64% better floating-point performance: 903.2 gflops vs 549.1 gflops
• Around 80% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1000 MHz
• Around 14% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1126 vs 986
• Around 3% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5925 vs 5753
• Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2132 vs 1893
• Around 73% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3065 vs 1775
• Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 vs 3158
• Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2132 vs 1893
• Around 73% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3065 vs 1775
• Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 vs 3158

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 M260X
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 940M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	986 1126
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	161 154
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	5753 5925
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1893 2132
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1775 3065
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3158 3357
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1893 2132
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1775 3065
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3158 3357

Compare specifications (specs)