AMD Radeon R7 M265 vs AMD Radeon HD 7560D
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 M265 and AMD Radeon HD 7560D videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 M265
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 18% higher core clock speed: 900 MHz vs 760 MHz
- Around 50% higher pipelines: 384 vs 256
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 32 nm
- Around 19% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 546 vs 458
- 4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5587 vs 1395
- 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1551 vs 593
- Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1264 vs 1076
- Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2424 vs 1990
- 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1551 vs 593
- Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1264 vs 1076
- Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2424 vs 1990
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 20 May 2014 vs 26 September 2012 |
Core clock speed | 900 MHz vs 760 MHz |
Pipelines | 384 vs 256 |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 32 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 546 vs 458 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5587 vs 1395 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1551 vs 593 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1264 vs 1076 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2424 vs 1990 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1551 vs 593 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1264 vs 1076 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2424 vs 1990 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7560D
- Around 20% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 165 vs 138
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 165 vs 138 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 M265
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7560D
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R7 M265 | AMD Radeon HD 7560D |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 546 | 458 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 138 | 165 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5587 | 1395 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 12.031 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 282.111 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.455 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 21.704 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 68.392 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1551 | 593 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1264 | 1076 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2424 | 1990 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1551 | 593 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1264 | 1076 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2424 | 1990 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R7 M265 | AMD Radeon HD 7560D | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Terascale 3 |
Code name | Topaz | Trinity |
Design | AMD Radeon R7 200 Series | |
Launch date | 20 May 2014 | 26 September 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 1415 | 1418 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 825 MHz | |
Compute units | 6 | |
Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 760 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 633.6 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 32 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 256 |
Texture fill rate | 19.8 GTexel / s | |
Transistor count | 3,100 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 x8 | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11 | 11 |
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | Not Listed | |
OpenGL | 4.4 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 32 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz | |
Memory type | DDR3 | |
Shared memory | 0 | 1 |
Technologies |
||
DualGraphics | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
PCIe 3.0 | ||
PowerTune | ||
Switchable graphics | ||
Zero Core | ||
ZeroCore |