Intel UHD Graphics 615 vs AMD Radeon R7 M265

Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 615 and AMD Radeon R7 M265 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 615

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 5 month(s) later
• Around 27% higher boost clock speed: 1050 MHz vs 825 MHz
• 1272.7x more texture fill rate: 25.2 GTexel/s vs 19.8 GTexel / s
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 4x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 4 GB
• Around 35% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 736 vs 546
• Around 33% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 183 vs 138
• Around 53% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 18.422 vs 12.031
• Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1720 vs 1264
• Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1720 vs 1264

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 M265

• 3x more core clock speed: 900 MHz vs 300 MHz
• 16x more pipelines: 384 vs 24
• Around 57% better floating-point performance: 633.6 gflops vs 403.2 gflops
• Around 73% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5587 vs 3224
• Around 27% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 282.111 vs 221.42
• Around 14% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.455 vs 1.277
• Around 77% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 21.704 vs 12.269
• 3.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 68.392 vs 18.909
• Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1551 vs 1256
• Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2424 vs 1772
• Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1551 vs 1256
• Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2424 vs 1772

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 615
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 M265

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	736 546
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	183 138
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	3224 5587
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	18.422 12.031
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	221.42 282.111
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.277 1.455
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12.269 21.704
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	18.909 68.392
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1256 1551
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1720 1264
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1772 2424
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1256 1551
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1720 1264
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1772 2424

Compare specifications (specs)