AMD Radeon R7 M265 vs AMD Radeon R7 Mobile Graphics
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 M265 and AMD Radeon R7 Mobile Graphics videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 M265
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 month(s) later
- Around 62% higher core clock speed: 900 MHz vs 554 MHz
- Around 3% higher boost clock speed: 825 MHz vs 800 MHz
- Around 77% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1551 vs 877
- Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1264 vs 1131
- Around 77% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1551 vs 877
- Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1264 vs 1131
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 20 May 2014 vs 17 February 2014 |
| Core clock speed | 900 MHz vs 554 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 825 MHz vs 800 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1551 vs 877 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1264 vs 1131 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1551 vs 877 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1264 vs 1131 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 Mobile Graphics
- Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2817 vs 2424
- Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2817 vs 2424
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2817 vs 2424 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2817 vs 2424 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 M265
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 Mobile Graphics
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon R7 M265 | AMD Radeon R7 Mobile Graphics |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 546 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 138 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5587 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 12.031 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 282.111 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.455 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 21.704 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 68.392 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1551 | 877 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1264 | 1131 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2424 | 2817 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1551 | 877 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1264 | 1131 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2424 | 2817 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon R7 M265 | AMD Radeon R7 Mobile Graphics | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | GCN 2.0 |
| Code name | Topaz | Spectre |
| Design | AMD Radeon R7 200 Series | |
| Launch date | 20 May 2014 | 17 February 2014 |
| Place in performance rating | 1396 | 1398 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 825 MHz | 800 MHz |
| Compute units | 6 | |
| Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 554 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 633.6 gflops | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | |
| Texture fill rate | 19.8 GTexel / s | |
| Transistor count | 3,100 million | 2,410 million |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 90 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 x8 | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | IGP |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 11 | 12.0 (12_0) |
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | Not Listed | |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 32 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz | |
| Memory type | DDR3 | |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| DualGraphics | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| HD3D | ||
| PCIe 3.0 | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| Switchable graphics | ||
| Zero Core | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon R7 M265 with others
AMDRadeon R7 M265 vs
AMDRadeon R5 240 OEM
AMDRadeon R7 M265 vs
AMDRadeon R7 Mobile Graphics
AMDRadeon R7 M265 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 710A
AMDRadeon R7 M265 vs
AMDRadeon R7 M340
AMDRadeon R7 M265 vs
AMDRadeon R5 M320
AMDRadeon R7 M265 vs
IntelHD Graphics 520
