Intel HD Graphics 520 vs AMD Radeon R7 M265

Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 520 and AMD Radeon R7 M265 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 520

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 3 month(s) later
• Around 27% higher boost clock speed: 1050 MHz vs 825 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 8x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 4 GB
• Around 59% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 868 vs 546
• Around 53% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 211 vs 138
• Around 82% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 21.852 vs 12.031
• Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1462 vs 1264
• Around 38% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3337 vs 2424
• Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1462 vs 1264
• Around 38% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3337 vs 2424

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 M265

• 3x more core clock speed: 900 MHz vs 300 MHz
• 16x more pipelines: 384 vs 24
• Around 39% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5587 vs 4014
• Around 97% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 282.111 vs 143.083
• Around 17% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.455 vs 1.243
• Around 67% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 21.704 vs 12.958
• 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 68.392 vs 28.182
• Around 63% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1551 vs 951
• Around 63% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1551 vs 951

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 520
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 M265

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	868 546
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	211 138
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	4014 5587
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	21.852 12.031
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	143.083 282.111
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.243 1.455
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12.958 21.704
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	28.182 68.392
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	951 1551
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1462 1264
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3337 2424
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	951 1551
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1462 1264
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3337 2424

Compare specifications (specs)