NVIDIA GeForce 910M vs AMD Radeon R7 M270

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 910M and AMD Radeon R7 M270 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 910M

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 7 month(s) later
  • Around 7% higher core clock speed: 775 MHz vs 725 MHz
  • 4.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2590 vs 527
  • Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3020 vs 2081
  • 4.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2590 vs 527
  • Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3020 vs 2081
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 18 August 2015 vs 9 January 2014
Core clock speed 775 MHz vs 725 MHz
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2590 vs 527
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3020 vs 2081
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2590 vs 527
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3020 vs 2081

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 M270

  • Around 60% higher texture fill rate: 19.8 GTexel / s vs 12.4 GTexel / s
  • 2.1x better floating-point performance: 633.6 gflops vs 297.6 gflops
  • Around 30% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 767 vs 590
  • Around 28% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 153 vs 120
  • 2.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 6810 vs 2629
  • 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 14.826 vs 6.448
  • Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1747 vs 1344
  • Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1747 vs 1344
Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate 19.8 GTexel / s vs 12.4 GTexel / s
Floating-point performance 633.6 gflops vs 297.6 gflops
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 767 vs 590
PassMark - G2D Mark 153 vs 120
Geekbench - OpenCL 6810 vs 2629
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 14.826 vs 6.448
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1747 vs 1344
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1747 vs 1344

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 910M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 M270

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
590
767
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
120
153
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
2629
6810
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
6.448
14.826
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1344
1747
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2590
527
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3020
2081
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1344
1747
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2590
527
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3020
2081
Name NVIDIA GeForce 910M AMD Radeon R7 M270
PassMark - G3D Mark 590 767
PassMark - G2D Mark 120 153
Geekbench - OpenCL 2629 6810
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 6.448 14.826
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 155.993
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.574
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 12.2
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 27.733
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1344 1747
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2590 527
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3020 2081
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1344 1747
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2590 527
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3020 2081

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce 910M AMD Radeon R7 M270

Essentials

Architecture Fermi 2.0 GCN 1.0
Code name GF117 Opal
Launch date 18 August 2015 9 January 2014
Place in performance rating 1381 1382
Type Laptop Desktop
Design AMD Radeon R7 200 Series

Technical info

Core clock speed 775 MHz 725 MHz
Floating-point performance 297.6 gflops 633.6 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 384 384
Texture fill rate 12.4 GTexel / s 19.8 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 33 Watt
Transistor count 585 million 1,040 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Bus support PCI Express 3.0 PCIe 3.0
Interface PCIe 2.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors None
Laptop size medium sized

API support

DirectX 12.0 (11_0) 11
OpenGL 4.5 4.4
Mantle
OpenCL Not Listed

Memory

Memory bandwidth 14.4 GB / s 28.8 GB / s
Memory bus width 64 Bit
Memory clock speed 1800 MHz
Memory type DDR3 Not Listed
Shared memory 0 0

Technologies

CUDA
GameWorks
GPU Boost
Optimus
DualGraphics
FreeSync
HD3D
PCIe 3.0
PowerTune
Switchable graphics
Zero Core
ZeroCore