AMD Radeon R7 M360 vs ATI Radeon HD 4670
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 M360 and ATI Radeon HD 4670 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 M360
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 47% higher core clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 750 MHz
- Around 13% higher texture fill rate: 27 GTexel / s vs 24 GTexel / s
- Around 20% higher pipelines: 384 vs 320
- Around 80% better floating-point performance: 864.0 gflops vs 480.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 55 nm
- 8x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 512 MB
- Around 52% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 575 vs 379
- 3.9x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 149 vs 38
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 5 May 2015 vs 10 September 2008 |
Core clock speed | 1100 MHz vs 750 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 27 GTexel / s vs 24 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 384 vs 320 |
Floating-point performance | 864.0 gflops vs 480.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 55 nm |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 512 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 575 vs 379 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 149 vs 38 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 4670
- Around 60% higher memory clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3285 vs 2460
- Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3285 vs 2460
Specifications (specs) | |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3285 vs 2460 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3285 vs 2460 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 M360
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 4670
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R7 M360 | ATI Radeon HD 4670 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 575 | 379 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 149 | 38 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4837 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 14.911 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 141.079 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.927 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 14.763 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 49.774 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1384 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1280 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2460 | 3285 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1384 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1280 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2460 | 3285 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R7 M360 | ATI Radeon HD 4670 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | TeraScale |
Code name | Meso | RV730 |
Design | AMD Radeon R7 300 Series | |
Launch date | 5 May 2015 | 10 September 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 1437 | 1436 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $67 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1125 MHz | |
Compute units | 6 | |
Core clock speed | 1100 MHz | 750 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 864.0 gflops | 480.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 320 |
Texture fill rate | 27 GTexel / s | 24 GTexel / s |
Transistor count | 3,100 million | 514 million |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 59 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Eyefinity | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 193 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 10.1 |
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | Not Listed | |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 3.3 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | 25.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
DualGraphics | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
PowerTune | ||
Switchable graphics | ||
ZeroCore |