AMD Radeon R7 M360 vs ATI Radeon HD 4670
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 M360 and ATI Radeon HD 4670 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 M360
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 47% higher core clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 750 MHz
- Around 13% higher texture fill rate: 27 GTexel / s vs 24 GTexel / s
- Around 20% higher pipelines: 384 vs 320
- Around 80% better floating-point performance: 864.0 gflops vs 480.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 55 nm
- 8x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 512 MB
- Around 51% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 573 vs 380
- 3.9x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 149 vs 38
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 5 May 2015 vs 10 September 2008 |
| Core clock speed | 1100 MHz vs 750 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 27 GTexel / s vs 24 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 384 vs 320 |
| Floating-point performance | 864.0 gflops vs 480.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 55 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 512 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 573 vs 380 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 149 vs 38 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 4670
- Around 60% higher memory clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3285 vs 2460
- Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3285 vs 2460
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3285 vs 2460 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3285 vs 2460 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 M360
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 4670
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon R7 M360 | ATI Radeon HD 4670 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 573 | 380 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 149 | 38 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5211 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 14.911 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 141.079 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.927 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 14.763 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 49.774 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1384 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1280 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2460 | 3285 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1384 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1280 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2460 | 3285 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon R7 M360 | ATI Radeon HD 4670 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | TeraScale |
| Code name | Meso | RV730 |
| Design | AMD Radeon R7 300 Series | |
| Launch date | 5 May 2015 | 10 September 2008 |
| Place in performance rating | 1438 | 1436 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $67 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1125 MHz | |
| Compute units | 6 | |
| Core clock speed | 1100 MHz | 750 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 864.0 gflops | 480.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 320 |
| Texture fill rate | 27 GTexel / s | 24 GTexel / s |
| Transistor count | 3,100 million | 514 million |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 59 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
| Eyefinity | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 193 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 10.1 |
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | Not Listed | |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 3.3 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 512 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | 25.6 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| DualGraphics | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| HD3D | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| Switchable graphics | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon R7 M360 with others
AMDRadeon R7 M360 vs
ATIRadeon HD 4670
AMDRadeon R7 M360 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 9600 GSO 512
AMDRadeon R7 M360 vs
AMDRadeon R5 M230
AMDRadeon R7 M360 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 810M
AMDRadeon R7 M360 vs
AMDFirePro S4000X
AMDRadeon R7 M360 vs
AppleA12Z Bionic
