AMD Radeon R7 M445 vs Intel HD Graphics 530

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 M445 and Intel HD Graphics 530 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 M445

• Videocard is newer: launch date 8 month(s) later
• 2.2x more core clock speed: 780 MHz vs 350 MHz
• 13.3x more pipelines: 320 vs 24
• Around 46% better floating-point performance: 588.8 gflops vs 403.2 gflops
• Around 22% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5361 vs 4397
• Around 23% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 24.335 vs 19.781
• Around 79% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 54.067 vs 30.177
• Around 83% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1913 vs 1045
• Around 83% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1913 vs 1045

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 530

• Around 25% higher boost clock speed: 1150 MHz vs 920 MHz
• Around 37% higher texture fill rate: 25.2 GTexel / s vs 18.4 GTexel / s
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 15-25 Watt
• 16x more maximum memory size: 64 GB vs 4 GB
• Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 995 vs 939
• Around 44% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 254 vs 176
• Around 95% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 30.747 vs 15.765
• Around 19% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 330.464 vs 278.624
• Around 42% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.804 vs 1.268
• Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2393 vs 2138
• Around 81% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3346 vs 1853
• Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2393 vs 2138
• Around 81% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3346 vs 1853

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 M445
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 530

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	939 995
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	176 254
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	5361 4397
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	15.765 30.747
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	278.624 330.464
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.268 1.804
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	24.335 19.781
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	54.067 30.177
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1913 1045
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2138 2393
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1853 3346
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1913 1045
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2138 2393
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1853 3346

Compare specifications (specs)