AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs ATI FireGL V3100
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM and ATI FireGL V3100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- 2.3x more core clock speed: 900 MHz vs 391 MHz
- 19x more texture fill rate: 29.76 GTexel / s vs 1.564 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 110 nm
- 16x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 128 MB
- 11.7x more memory clock speed: 4600 MHz vs 392 MHz
- Around 43% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 394 vs 275
- 27.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1457 vs 53
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 21 December 2013 vs 1 September 2004 |
Core clock speed | 900 MHz vs 391 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 29.76 GTexel / s vs 1.564 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 110 nm |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 128 MB |
Memory clock speed | 4600 MHz vs 392 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 394 vs 275 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1457 vs 53 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM
GPU 2: ATI FireGL V3100
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM | ATI FireGL V3100 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 394 | 275 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1457 | 53 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 40722 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3112 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3112 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3168 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3168 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM | ATI FireGL V3100 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Rage 9 |
Code name | Cape Verde | RV370 |
Launch date | 21 December 2013 | 1 September 2004 |
Place in performance rating | 601 | 606 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 930 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 391 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 952.3 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 110 nm |
Pipelines | 512 | |
Texture fill rate | 29.76 GTexel / s | 1.564 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | |
Transistor count | 1,500 million | 107 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 9.0 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 2.0 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 128 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 73.6 GB / s | 3.136 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4600 MHz | 392 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR |