AMD Radeon R9 270X vs ATI Radeon HD 4870 X2
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 270X and ATI Radeon HD 4870 X2 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 270X
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 20% better floating-point performance: 2,688 gflops vs 2x 1,120.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 55 nm
- Around 59% lower typical power consumption: 180 Watt vs 286 Watt
- 3.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4893 vs 1309
- Around 8% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 612 vs 565
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3350 vs 3323
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3350 vs 3323
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 8 October 2013 vs 12 August 2008 |
Floating-point performance | 2,688 gflops vs 2x 1,120.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 55 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 180 Watt vs 286 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4893 vs 1309 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 612 vs 565 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3350 vs 3323 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3350 vs 3323 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 4870 X2
- 2.7x more texture fill rate: 2x 28 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 84 GTexel / s
- Around 25% higher pipelines: 2x 800 vs 1280
Texture fill rate | 2x 28 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 84 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2x 800 vs 1280 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 270X
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 4870 X2
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R9 270X | ATI Radeon HD 4870 X2 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4893 | 1309 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 612 | 565 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 63.455 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1314.545 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.339 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 85.21 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 315.366 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8068 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3706 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3350 | 3323 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8068 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3706 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3350 | 3323 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1771 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R9 270X | ATI Radeon HD 4870 X2 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | TeraScale |
Code name | Curacao | R700 |
Design | AMD Radeon R9 200 Series | |
Launch date | 8 October 2013 | 12 August 2008 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $199 | $550 |
Place in performance rating | 439 | 436 |
Price now | $399 | |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 16.05 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz | |
Floating-point performance | 2,688 gflops | 2x 1,120.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
Pipelines | 1280 | 2x 800 |
Stream Processors | 1280 | |
Texture fill rate | 84 GTexel / s | 2x 28 GTexel / s billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 180 Watt | 286 Watt |
Transistor count | 2,800 million | 956 million |
Core clock speed | 700 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 2 x 6-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Length | 267 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 10.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2x 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 179.2 GB/s | 2x 115.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 2x 256 Bit |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
CrossFire | ||
DDMA audio | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
LiquidVR | ||
TressFX | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) |