AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM vs AMD FirePro M5100

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM and AMD FirePro M5100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 6 month(s) later
• Around 38% higher core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 725 MHz
• Around 35% higher boost clock speed: 1050 MHz vs 775 MHz
• Around 63% higher texture fill rate: 50.4 GTexel / s vs 31 GTexel / s
• Around 20% higher pipelines: 768 vs 640
• Around 63% better floating-point performance: 1,613 gflops vs 992.0 gflops
• Around 44% higher memory clock speed: 6500 MHz vs 4500 MHz
• Around 44% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3032 vs 2103
• 2.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 14269 vs 6837
• Around 77% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 39.283 vs 22.202
• Around 52% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 815.354 vs 537.558
• Around 53% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.437 vs 2.245
• Around 57% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 63.718 vs 40.642
• Around 58% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 171.258 vs 108.052
• Around 53% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4468 vs 2926
• Around 53% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4468 vs 2926

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro M5100

• Around 74% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 800 vs 460
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3713 vs 3667
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 3340
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3713 vs 3667
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 3340

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM
GPU 2: AMD FirePro M5100

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	3032 2103
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	460 800
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	14269 6837
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	39.283 22.202
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	815.354 537.558
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3.437 2.245
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	63.718 40.642
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	171.258 108.052
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4468 2926
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3667 3713
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3340 3358
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4468 2926
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3667 3713
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3340 3358

Compare specifications (specs)