AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce 720A
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM and NVIDIA GeForce 720A videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 10 month(s) later
- Around 7% higher core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 938 MHz
- 3.4x more texture fill rate: 50.4 GTexel / s vs 15.01 GTexel / s
- 8x more pipelines: 768 vs 96
- 4.5x better floating-point performance: 1,613 gflops vs 360.2 gflops
- 3.3x more memory clock speed: 6500 MHz vs 2000 MHz
- 5.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3032 vs 577
- Around 82% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 460 vs 253
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 5 May 2015 vs 1 July 2014 |
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 938 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 50.4 GTexel / s vs 15.01 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 768 vs 96 |
Floating-point performance | 1,613 gflops vs 360.2 gflops |
Memory clock speed | 6500 MHz vs 2000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3032 vs 577 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 460 vs 253 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 720A
- 2.6x lower typical power consumption: 33 Watt vs 85 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt vs 85 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 720A
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce 720A |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3032 | 577 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 460 | 253 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 14269 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 39.283 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 815.354 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.437 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 63.718 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 171.258 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4468 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3667 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4468 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3667 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce 720A | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Fermi 2.0 |
Code name | Tobago | GF117 |
Launch date | 5 May 2015 | 1 July 2014 |
Place in performance rating | 641 | 642 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz | 938 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,613 gflops | 360.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 768 | 96 |
Texture fill rate | 50.4 GTexel / s | 15.01 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 85 Watt | 33 Watt |
Transistor count | 2,080 million | 585 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 165 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 104.0 GB / s | 16 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6500 MHz | 2000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |