AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM vs Intel HD Graphics P4000
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM and Intel HD Graphics P4000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 54% higher core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 650 MHz
- 5.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3032 vs 516
- 13.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 14269 vs 1071
- Around 65% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3667 vs 2225
- Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3340 vs 2461
- Around 65% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3667 vs 2225
- Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3340 vs 2461
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 5 May 2015 vs 14 May 2012 |
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 650 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3032 vs 516 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 14269 vs 1071 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3667 vs 2225 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 vs 2461 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3667 vs 2225 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 vs 2461 |
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics P4000
- Around 19% higher boost clock speed: 1250 MHz vs 1050 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 89% lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 85 Watt
- Around 38% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 636 vs 460
Specifications (specs) | |
Boost clock speed | 1250 MHz vs 1050 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt vs 85 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 636 vs 460 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics P4000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM | Intel HD Graphics P4000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3032 | 516 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 460 | 636 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 14269 | 1071 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 39.283 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 815.354 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.437 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 63.718 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 171.258 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4468 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3667 | 2225 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 | 2461 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4468 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3667 | 2225 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 | 2461 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM | Intel HD Graphics P4000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Generation 7.0 |
Code name | Tobago | Ivy Bridge GT2 |
Launch date | 5 May 2015 | 14 May 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 650 | 615 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz | 1250 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz | 650 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,613 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 22 nm |
Pipelines | 768 | |
Texture fill rate | 50.4 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 85 Watt | 45 Watt |
Transistor count | 2,080 million | 1,200 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Length | 165 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 11.1 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.0 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 104.0 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 6500 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 |