AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM vs NVIDIA Tesla K40m

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM and NVIDIA Tesla K40m videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM

NVIDIA Tesla K40m

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM

Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 5 month(s) later
Around 50% higher core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 667 MHz
Around 41% higher boost clock speed: 1050 MHz vs 745 MHz
2.9x lower typical power consumption: 85 Watt vs 245 Watt
Around 8% higher memory clock speed: 6500 MHz vs 6008 MHz
4.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 460 vs 111

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	5 May 2015 vs 22 November 2013
Core clock speed	1000 MHz vs 667 MHz
Boost clock speed	1050 MHz vs 745 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	85 Watt vs 245 Watt
Memory clock speed	6500 MHz vs 6008 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	460 vs 111

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla K40m

3.5x more texture fill rate: 178.8 GTexel / s vs 50.4 GTexel / s
3.8x more pipelines: 2880 vs 768
2.7x better floating-point performance: 4,291 gflops vs 1,613 gflops
6x more maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 2 GB
Around 8% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3281 vs 3032
Around 37% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 19542 vs 14269
Around 74% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 68.519 vs 39.283
2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1884.11 vs 815.354
Around 85% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 6.358 vs 3.437
Around 84% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 117.253 vs 63.718
Around 81% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 310.472 vs 171.258

Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate	178.8 GTexel / s vs 50.4 GTexel / s
Pipelines	2880 vs 768
Floating-point performance	4,291 gflops vs 1,613 gflops
Maximum memory size	12 GB vs 2 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	3281 vs 3032
Geekbench - OpenCL	19542 vs 14269
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	68.519 vs 39.283
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1884.11 vs 815.354
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	6.358 vs 3.437
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	117.253 vs 63.718
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	310.472 vs 171.258

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla K40m

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

3032

3281

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

460

111

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

14269

19542

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

39.283

68.519

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

815.354

1884.11

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3.437

6.358

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

63.718

117.253

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

171.258

310.472

Name	AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM	NVIDIA Tesla K40m
PassMark - G3D Mark	3032	3281
PassMark - G2D Mark	460	111
Geekbench - OpenCL	14269	19542
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	39.283	68.519
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	815.354	1884.11
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	3.437	6.358
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	63.718	117.253
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	171.258	310.472
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	4468
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3667
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3340
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	4468
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3667
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3340

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM	NVIDIA Tesla K40m
Essentials
Architecture	GCN 2.0	Kepler
Code name	Tobago	GK110B
Launch date	5 May 2015	22 November 2013
Place in performance rating	663	665
Type	Desktop	Workstation
Launch price (MSRP)		$7,699
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1050 MHz	745 MHz
Core clock speed	1000 MHz	667 MHz
Floating-point performance	1,613 gflops	4,291 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	768	2880
Texture fill rate	50.4 GTexel / s	178.8 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	85 Watt	245 Watt
Transistor count	2,080 million	7,080 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	165 mm	267 mm
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin
API support
DirectX	12.0 (12_0)	12.0 (11_1)
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	12 GB
Memory bandwidth	104.0 GB / s	288.4 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	6500 MHz	6008 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5