AMD Radeon R9 370 vs AMD FirePro W8000
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 370 and AMD FirePro W8000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 370
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 3% higher core clock speed: 925 MHz vs 900 MHz
- 3.2x lower typical power consumption: 110 Watt vs 350 Watt
- Around 2% higher memory clock speed: 5600 MHz vs 5500 MHz
- Around 15% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4722 vs 4096
- Around 68% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 781 vs 464
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 5 May 2015 vs 14 June 2012 |
| Core clock speed | 925 MHz vs 900 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 110 Watt vs 350 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 5600 MHz vs 5500 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4722 vs 4096 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 781 vs 464 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 vs 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 vs 3717 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W8000
- Around 29% higher texture fill rate: 100.8 GTexel / s vs 78 GTexel / s
- Around 40% higher pipelines: 1792 vs 1280
- Around 29% better floating-point performance: 3,226 gflops vs 2,496 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 10% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 82941 vs 75346
- Around 15% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 387.109 vs 336.491
- Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7400 vs 6096
- Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7400 vs 6096
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 100.8 GTexel / s vs 78 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1792 vs 1280 |
| Floating-point performance | 3,226 gflops vs 2,496 gflops |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 82941 vs 75346 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 64.628 vs 64.576 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 387.109 vs 336.491 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7400 vs 6096 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7400 vs 6096 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 370
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W8000
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon R9 370 | AMD FirePro W8000 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4722 | 4096 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 781 | 464 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 75346 | 82941 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 64.576 | 64.628 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 336.491 | 387.109 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6096 | 7400 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6096 | 7400 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 3357 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon R9 370 | AMD FirePro W8000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Trinidad | Tahiti |
| Launch date | 5 May 2015 | 14 June 2012 |
| Place in performance rating | 407 | 409 |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $1,599 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 975 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 925 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 2,496 gflops | 3,226 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 1280 | 1792 |
| Texture fill rate | 78 GTexel / s | 100.8 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 110 Watt | 350 Watt |
| Transistor count | 2,800 million | 4,313 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 4x DisplayPort, 1x SDI |
| DisplayPort count | 4 | |
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| StereoOutput3D | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 221 mm | 279 mm |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | 2x 6-pin |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Form factor | Full Height / Full Length | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 179.2 GB / s | 176 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5600 MHz | 5500 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon R9 370 with others
AMDRadeon R9 370 vs
ATIFireGL V8650
AMDRadeon R9 370 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 9800 GTX
AMDRadeon R9 370 vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 540v
AMDRadeon R9 370 vs
AMDFirePro W8000
AMDRadeon R9 370 vs
NVIDIATesla K20m
AMDRadeon R9 370 vs
AMDRadeon R7 370
