AMD Radeon R9 370 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 370 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 370

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 2 month(s) later
• Around 80% higher texture fill rate: 78 GTexel / s vs 43.4 GTexel / s
• 2x more pipelines: 1280 vs 640
• Around 80% better floating-point performance: 2,496 gflops vs 1,389 gflops
• 1120x more memory clock speed: 5600 MHz vs 5.4 GB/s
• Around 21% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4722 vs 3901
• Around 50% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 781 vs 521
• 6.5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 75346 vs 11526
• Around 52% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 64.576 vs 42.463
• 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 336.491 vs 133.458
• Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6096 vs 4843
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3718 vs 3683
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 vs 3329
• Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6096 vs 4843
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3718 vs 3683
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 vs 3329

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

• Around 10% higher core clock speed: 1020 MHz vs 925 MHz
• Around 11% higher boost clock speed: 1085 MHz vs 975 MHz
• Around 83% lower typical power consumption: 60 Watt vs 110 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 370
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	4722 3901
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	781 521
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	75346 11526
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	64.576 42.463
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	336.491 133.458
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6096 4843
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3718 3683
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3357 3329
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6096 4843
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3718 3683
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3357 3329

Compare specifications (specs)