AMD Radeon R9 370 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon R9 370 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R9 370
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 2 mois plus tard
- Environ 80% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 78 GTexel / s versus 43.4 GTexel / s
- 2x plus de pipelines: 1280 versus 640
- Environ 80% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2,496 gflops versus 1,389 gflops
- 1120x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 5600 MHz versus 5.4 GB/s
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 4722 versus 3901
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 781 versus 521
- 6.5x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 75346 versus 11526
- Environ 52% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 64.576 versus 42.463
- 2.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 336.491 versus 133.458
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6096 versus 4843
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3718 versus 3683
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 versus 3329
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6096 versus 4843
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3718 versus 3683
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 versus 3329
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 5 May 2015 versus 18 February 2014 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 78 GTexel / s versus 43.4 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1280 versus 640 |
| Performance á point flottant | 2,496 gflops versus 1,389 gflops |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5600 MHz versus 5.4 GB/s |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4722 versus 3901 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 781 versus 521 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 75346 versus 11526 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 64.576 versus 42.463 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 336.491 versus 133.458 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6096 versus 4843 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 versus 3683 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 versus 3329 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6096 versus 4843 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 versus 3683 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 versus 3329 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
- Environ 10% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1020 MHz versus 925 MHz
- Environ 11% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1085 MHz versus 975 MHz
- Environ 83% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 60 Watt versus 110 Watt
| Vitesse du noyau | 1020 MHz versus 925 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1085 MHz versus 975 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt versus 110 Watt |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 370
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon R9 370 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4722 | 3901 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 781 | 521 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 75346 | 11526 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 64.576 | 42.463 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 336.491 | 133.458 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6096 | 4843 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 3683 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 3329 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6096 | 4843 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 3683 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 3329 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | 117 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 642.715 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.933 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 26.532 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon R9 370 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Maxwell |
| Nom de code | Trinidad | GM107 |
| Date de sortie | 5 May 2015 | 18 February 2014 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 412 | 707 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $149 | |
| Prix maintenant | $299.01 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 15.02 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 975 MHz | 1085 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 925 MHz | 1020 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 2,496 gflops | 1,389 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 1280 | 640 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 78 GTexel / s | 43.4 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 110 Watt | 60 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 2,800 million | 1,870 million |
| Noyaux CUDA | 640 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One mini... |
| Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 221 mm | 5.7" (14.5 cm) |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin | None |
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 179.2 GB / s | 86.4 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5600 MHz | 5.4 GB/s |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision Live | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Blu Ray 3D | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon R9 370 avec des autres
AMDRadeon R9 370 vs
ATIRadeon X1800 GTO²
AMDRadeon R9 370 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 7950 GX2
AMDRadeon R9 370 vs
AMDFirePro S7000
AMDRadeon R9 370 vs
NVIDIATesla K20m
AMDRadeon R9 370 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7690M XT
AMDRadeon R9 370 vs
AMDRadeon R7 370
