AMD Radeon R9 380X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 380X and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 380X
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 2048 vs 1536
- Around 19% better floating-point performance: 3,973 gflops vs 3,333 gflops
- Around 21% lower typical power consumption: 190 Watt vs 230 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6171 vs 5939
- Around 20% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 677 vs 562
- Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9685 vs 7412
- Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9685 vs 7412
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 vs 3690
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 vs 3690
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3361 vs 3340
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3361 vs 3340
- Around 42% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3053 vs 2155
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 19 November 2015 vs 30 May 2013 |
| Pipelines | 2048 vs 1536 |
| Floating-point performance | 3,973 gflops vs 3,333 gflops |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 190 Watt vs 230 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6171 vs 5939 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 677 vs 562 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9685 vs 7412 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9685 vs 7412 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 3690 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 3690 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 vs 3340 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 vs 3340 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3053 vs 2155 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770
- Around 12% higher boost clock speed: 1085 MHz vs 970 MHz
- Around 8% higher texture fill rate: 134 billion / sec vs 124.2 GTexel / s
- 7.2x more memory clock speed: 7012 MHz vs 970 MHz
| Boost clock speed | 1085 MHz vs 970 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 134 billion / sec vs 124.2 GTexel / s |
| Memory clock speed | 7012 MHz vs 970 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 380X
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon R9 380X | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6171 | 5939 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 677 | 562 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9685 | 7412 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9685 | 7412 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3690 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3690 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 | 3340 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 | 3340 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3053 | 2155 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 18068 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 49.824 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1089.67 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.899 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 44.06 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 103.884 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon R9 380X | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Kepler |
| Code name | Antigua | GK104 |
| Design | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series | |
| Launch date | 19 November 2015 | 30 May 2013 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $229 | $399 |
| Place in performance rating | 309 | 515 |
| Price now | $528.44 | $449.99 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 15.61 | 15.45 |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 970 MHz | 1085 MHz |
| Compute units | 32 | |
| Floating-point performance | 3,973 gflops | 3,333 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 2048 | 1536 |
| Stream Processors | 2048 | |
| Texture fill rate | 124.2 GTexel / s | 134 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 190 Watt | 230 Watt |
| Transistor count | 5,000 million | 3,540 million |
| Core clock speed | 1046 MHz | |
| CUDA cores | 1536 | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 98 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Number of Eyefinity displays | 6 | |
| VGA | ||
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | PCI Express 3.0 |
| Form factor | Full Height / Full Length | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 221 mm | 10.5" (26.7 cm) |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2 x 6-pin | One 8-pin and one 6-pin |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Minimum recommended system power | 600 Watt | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.3 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| High bandwidth memory (HBM) | ||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 182.4 GB/s | 224.3 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 970 MHz | 7012 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| DDMA audio | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| FRTC | ||
| HD3D | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| LiquidVR | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision Live | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Blu Ray 3D | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| PhysX | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon R9 380X with others
AMDRadeon R9 380X vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 980 Ti
AMDRadeon R9 380X vs
AMDRadeon R9 390
AMDRadeon R9 380X vs
AMDRadeon RX 460 1024SP
AMDRadeon R9 380X vs
NVIDIAP102-100
AMDRadeon R9 380X vs
NVIDIAQuadro P2200
AMDRadeon R9 380X vs
AMDRadeon RX 5500 XT
