AMD Radeon R9 M265X vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 745A

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 M265X and NVIDIA GeForce GT 745A videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M265X

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
  • Around 67% higher pipelines: 640 vs 384
  • Around 24% better floating-point performance: 800.0 gflops vs 642.8 gflops
  • 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
  • Around 66% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 20.633 vs 12.446
  • Around 89% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 525.038 vs 278.161
  • 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.169 vs 0.883
  • 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 37.076 vs 14.778
  • 3.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 94.404 vs 25.74
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 21 March 2014 vs 26 August 2013
Pipelines 640 vs 384
Floating-point performance 800.0 gflops vs 642.8 gflops
Maximum memory size 4 GB vs 2 GB
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 20.633 vs 12.446
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 525.038 vs 278.161
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 2.169 vs 0.883
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 37.076 vs 14.778
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 94.404 vs 25.74

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 745A

  • Around 46% higher core clock speed: 837 MHz vs 575 MHz
  • Around 7% higher texture fill rate: 26.78 GTexel / s vs 25 GTexel / s
  • Around 60% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1125 MHz
  • Around 8% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1228 vs 1138
  • Around 53% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 322 vs 210
  • 2.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 19809 vs 8829
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 837 MHz vs 575 MHz
Texture fill rate 26.78 GTexel / s vs 25 GTexel / s
Memory clock speed 1800 MHz vs 1125 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 1228 vs 1138
PassMark - G2D Mark 322 vs 210
Geekbench - OpenCL 19809 vs 8829

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M265X
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 745A

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
1138
1228
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
210
322
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
8829
19809
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
20.633
12.446
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
525.038
278.161
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2.169
0.883
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
37.076
14.778
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
94.404
25.74
Name AMD Radeon R9 M265X NVIDIA GeForce GT 745A
PassMark - G3D Mark 1138 1228
PassMark - G2D Mark 210 322
Geekbench - OpenCL 8829 19809
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 20.633 12.446
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 525.038 278.161
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 2.169 0.883
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 37.076 14.778
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 94.404 25.74
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1972
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1765
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3214
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1972
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1765
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3214

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon R9 M265X NVIDIA GeForce GT 745A

Essentials

Architecture GCN 1.0 Kepler
Code name Venus GK107
Design AMD Radeon R9 200 Series
Launch date 21 March 2014 26 August 2013
Place in performance rating 1176 1177
Type Desktop Desktop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 625 MHz
Compute units 10
Core clock speed 575 MHz 837 MHz
Floating-point performance 800.0 gflops 642.8 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 640 384
Texture fill rate 25 GTexel / s 26.78 GTexel / s
Transistor count 1,500 million 1,270 million
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 33 Watt

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs
Eyefinity

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Bus support PCIe 3.0 x16
Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Laptop size medium sized

API support

DirectX 11 12.0 (11_0)
Mantle
OpenCL Not Listed
OpenGL 4.4 4.6

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 2 GB
Memory bandwidth 72 GB/s 28.8 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 bit 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 1125 MHz 1800 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 DDR3
Shared memory 0

Technologies

AMD Eyefinity
DualGraphics
FreeSync
HD3D
PowerTune
Switchable graphics
ZeroCore