AMD Radeon R9 M265X vs AMD Radeon HD 7660D

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 M265X and AMD Radeon HD 7660D videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M265X

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 5 month(s) later
  • Around 67% higher pipelines: 640 vs 384
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 32 nm
  • 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1140 vs 503
  • Around 18% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 207 vs 176
  • 4.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 8856 vs 2003
  • Around 97% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1972 vs 1001
  • Around 97% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1972 vs 1001
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 21 March 2014 vs 26 September 2012
Pipelines 640 vs 384
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm vs 32 nm
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 1140 vs 503
PassMark - G2D Mark 207 vs 176
Geekbench - OpenCL 8856 vs 2003
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1972 vs 1001
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1972 vs 1001

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7660D

  • Around 10% higher core clock speed: 633 MHz vs 575 MHz
  • Around 28% higher boost clock speed: 800 MHz vs 625 MHz
  • Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2159 vs 1765
  • Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3327 vs 3214
  • Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2159 vs 1765
  • Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3327 vs 3214
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 633 MHz vs 575 MHz
Boost clock speed 800 MHz vs 625 MHz
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2159 vs 1765
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3327 vs 3214
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2159 vs 1765
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3327 vs 3214

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M265X
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7660D

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
1140
503
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
207
176
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
8856
2003
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1972
1001
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1765
2159
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3214
3327
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1972
1001
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1765
2159
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3214
3327
Name AMD Radeon R9 M265X AMD Radeon HD 7660D
PassMark - G3D Mark 1140 503
PassMark - G2D Mark 207 176
Geekbench - OpenCL 8856 2003
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 20.633
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 525.038
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 2.169
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 37.076
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 94.404
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1972 1001
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1765 2159
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3214 3327
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1972 1001
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1765 2159
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3214 3327

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon R9 M265X AMD Radeon HD 7660D

Essentials

Architecture GCN 1.0 Terascale 3
Code name Venus Trinity
Design AMD Radeon R9 200 Series
Launch date 21 March 2014 26 September 2012
Place in performance rating 1183 1186
Type Desktop Desktop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 625 MHz 800 MHz
Compute units 10
Core clock speed 575 MHz 633 MHz
Floating-point performance 800.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 32 nm
Pipelines 640 384
Texture fill rate 25 GTexel / s
Transistor count 1,500 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs
Eyefinity

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Bus support PCIe 3.0 x16
Interface PCIe 3.0 x16
Laptop size medium sized

API support

DirectX 11 11
Mantle
OpenCL Not Listed
OpenGL 4.4

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 4 GB
Memory bandwidth 72 GB/s
Memory bus width 128 bit
Memory clock speed 1125 MHz
Memory type GDDR5
Shared memory 0 1

Technologies

AMD Eyefinity
DualGraphics
FreeSync
HD3D
PowerTune
Switchable graphics
ZeroCore