AMD Radeon R9 M265X vs AMD Radeon HD 7660D
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 M265X and AMD Radeon HD 7660D videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M265X
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 67% higher pipelines: 640 vs 384
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 32 nm
- 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1140 vs 503
- Around 18% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 207 vs 176
- 4.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 8856 vs 2003
- Around 97% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1972 vs 1001
- Around 97% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1972 vs 1001
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 21 March 2014 vs 26 September 2012 |
Pipelines | 640 vs 384 |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 32 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1140 vs 503 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 207 vs 176 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 8856 vs 2003 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1972 vs 1001 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1972 vs 1001 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7660D
- Around 10% higher core clock speed: 633 MHz vs 575 MHz
- Around 28% higher boost clock speed: 800 MHz vs 625 MHz
- Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2159 vs 1765
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3327 vs 3214
- Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2159 vs 1765
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3327 vs 3214
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 633 MHz vs 575 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 800 MHz vs 625 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2159 vs 1765 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3327 vs 3214 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2159 vs 1765 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3327 vs 3214 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M265X
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7660D
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R9 M265X | AMD Radeon HD 7660D |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1140 | 503 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 207 | 176 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 8856 | 2003 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 20.633 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 525.038 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.169 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 37.076 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 94.404 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1972 | 1001 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1765 | 2159 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3214 | 3327 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1972 | 1001 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1765 | 2159 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3214 | 3327 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R9 M265X | AMD Radeon HD 7660D | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Terascale 3 |
Code name | Venus | Trinity |
Design | AMD Radeon R9 200 Series | |
Launch date | 21 March 2014 | 26 September 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 1183 | 1186 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 625 MHz | 800 MHz |
Compute units | 10 | |
Core clock speed | 575 MHz | 633 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 800.0 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 32 nm |
Pipelines | 640 | 384 |
Texture fill rate | 25 GTexel / s | |
Transistor count | 1,500 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Eyefinity | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11 | 11 |
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | Not Listed | |
OpenGL | 4.4 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1125 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Shared memory | 0 | 1 |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
DualGraphics | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
PowerTune | ||
Switchable graphics | ||
ZeroCore |