AMD Radeon R9 M275X versus AMD Radeon R7 250E
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon R9 M275X and AMD Radeon R7 250E pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R9 M275X
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 mois plus tard
- Environ 13% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 900 MHz versus 800 MHz
- Environ 45% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 37 GTexel / s versus 25.6 GTexel / s
- Environ 25% de pipelines plus haut: 640 versus 512
- Environ 45% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,184 gflops versus 819.2 gflops
- 4x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 4 GB versus 1 GB
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 28.109 versus 21.562
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3265 versus 2873
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3265 versus 2873
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 28 January 2014 versus 20 December 2013 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 900 MHz versus 800 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 37 GTexel / s versus 25.6 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 640 versus 512 |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,184 gflops versus 819.2 gflops |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 1 GB |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 28.109 versus 21.562 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3265 versus 2873 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3265 versus 2873 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R7 250E
- 4x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 4500 MHz versus 1125 MHz
- 2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 582.073 versus 283.116
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.2 versus 2.187
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 38.669 versus 33.837
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 98.052 versus 91.407
- 3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3698 versus 1228
- Environ 97% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3355 versus 1705
- 3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3698 versus 1228
- Environ 97% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3355 versus 1705
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 4500 MHz versus 1125 MHz |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 582.073 versus 283.116 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.2 versus 2.187 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 38.669 versus 33.837 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 98.052 versus 91.407 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3698 versus 1228 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 versus 1705 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3698 versus 1228 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 versus 1705 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M275X
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 250E
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon R9 M275X | AMD Radeon R7 250E |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1700 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 362 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 11041 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 28.109 | 21.562 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 283.116 | 582.073 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.187 | 2.2 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 33.837 | 38.669 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 91.407 | 98.052 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3265 | 2873 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1228 | 3698 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1705 | 3355 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3265 | 2873 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1228 | 3698 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1705 | 3355 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon R9 M275X | AMD Radeon R7 250E | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Nom de code | Venus | Cape Verde |
| Conception | AMD Radeon R9 200 Series | |
| Date de sortie | 28 January 2014 | 20 December 2013 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1074 | 1075 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $109 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 925 MHz | |
| Unités de Compute | 10 | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 900 MHz | 800 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,184 gflops | 819.2 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 640 | 512 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 37 GTexel / s | 25.6 GTexel / s |
| Compte de transistor | 1,500 million | 1,500 million |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| Eyefinity | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 168 mm | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 11 | 12.0 (11_1) |
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | Not Listed | |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | 1 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 72 GB/s | 72 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 bit | 128 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1125 MHz | 4500 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| DualGraphics | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| HD3D | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| Graphiques changeables | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon R9 M275X avec des autres
AMDRadeon R9 M275X vs
NVIDIAGeForce4 MX 440-SE
AMDRadeon R9 M275X vs
ATIMobility Radeon 9700
AMDRadeon R9 M275X vs
ATIRadeon HD 5470
AMDRadeon R9 M275X vs
NVIDIAQuadro K3100M
AMDRadeon R9 M275X vs
AMDRadeon R7 250E
AMDRadeon R9 M275X vs
AMDFirePro W4190M
