AMD Radeon R9 M360 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 SE

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 M360 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 SE videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M360

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 2 month(s) later
• Around 22% higher core clock speed: 900 MHz vs 736 MHz
• Around 78% higher pipelines: 512 vs 288
• Around 12% better floating-point performance: 947.2 gflops vs 847.9 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
• Around 7% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 451 vs 423
• Around 36% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 8493 vs 6235
• Around 6% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 19.479 vs 18.456
• Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.902 vs 1.693
• Around 25% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 34.15 vs 27.232
• Around 75% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 87.811 vs 50.114

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 SE

• Around 19% higher texture fill rate: 35.33 GTexel / s vs 29.6 GTexel / s
• 3.4x more memory clock speed: 3828 MHz vs 1125 MHz
• Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1914 vs 1836
• Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 618.773 vs 575.773
• Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2970 vs 2801
• Around 92% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3114 vs 1623
• Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2970 vs 2801
• Around 92% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3114 vs 1623

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M360
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 SE

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1836 1914
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	451 423
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	8493 6235
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	19.479 18.456
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	575.773 618.773
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.902 1.693
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	34.15 27.232
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	87.811 50.114
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2801 2970
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1623 3114
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3360 3356
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2801 2970
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1623 3114
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3360 3356

Compare specifications (specs)