AMD Radeon R9 M360 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 M360 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M360

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 1 month(s) later
• Around 51% higher core clock speed: 900 MHz vs 598 MHz
• Around 52% higher pipelines: 512 vs 336
• Around 18% better floating-point performance: 947.2 gflops vs 803.7 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• 2.7x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1526 MB
• Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1836 vs 1737
• Around 49% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 451 vs 303
• Around 24% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 8493 vs 6858
• Around 29% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 19.479 vs 15.053
• Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.902 vs 1.72
• Around 66% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 87.811 vs 52.899
• Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2801 vs 2731
• Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2801 vs 2731

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670M

• Around 13% higher texture fill rate: 33.5 billion / sec vs 29.6 GTexel / s
• Around 33% higher memory clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 1125 MHz
• Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 588.645 vs 575.773
• Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 35.916 vs 34.15
• 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3627 vs 1623
• 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3627 vs 1623

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M360
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1836 1737
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	451 303
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	8493 6858
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	19.479 15.053
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	575.773 588.645
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.902 1.72
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	34.15 35.916
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	87.811 52.899
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2801 2731
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1623 3627
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3360 3346
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2801 2731
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1623 3627
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3360 3346

Compare specifications (specs)