AMD Radeon R9 M370X Mac Edition vs Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 M370X Mac Edition and Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M370X Mac Edition
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- 3.9x more core clock speed: 775 MHz vs 200 MHz
- 3.1x more texture fill rate: 32 GTexel / s vs 10.4 GTexel / s
- 16x more pipelines: 640 vs 40
- 9.8x better floating-point performance: 1,024 gflops vs 104.0 gflops
- Around 31% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1548 vs 1180
- Around 89% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9620 vs 5083
- Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2862 vs 2095
- Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2862 vs 2095
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 5 May 2015 vs 27 May 2013 |
Core clock speed | 775 MHz vs 200 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 32 GTexel / s vs 10.4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 640 vs 40 |
Floating-point performance | 1,024 gflops vs 104.0 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1548 vs 1180 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9620 vs 5083 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2862 vs 2095 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2862 vs 2095 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200
- Around 63% higher boost clock speed: 1300 MHz vs 800 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 390 vs 350
- Around 97% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3285 vs 1667
- Around 97% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3285 vs 1667
Specifications (specs) | |
Boost clock speed | 1300 MHz vs 800 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm vs 28 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 390 vs 350 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3285 vs 1667 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3285 vs 1667 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M370X Mac Edition
GPU 2: Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R9 M370X Mac Edition | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1548 | 1180 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 350 | 390 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9620 | 5083 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 25.151 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 516.994 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.321 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 32.932 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 111.138 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2862 | 2095 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1667 | 3285 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3326 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2862 | 2095 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1667 | 3285 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3326 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R9 M370X Mac Edition | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Generation 7.5 |
Code name | Tropo | Haswell GT3e |
Launch date | 5 May 2015 | 27 May 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 1002 | 661 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 800 MHz | 1300 MHz |
Core clock speed | 775 MHz | 200 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,024 gflops | 104.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 22 nm |
Pipelines | 640 | 40 |
Texture fill rate | 32 GTexel / s | 10.4 GTexel / s |
Transistor count | 1,500 million | 392 million |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 72 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | eDRAM |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |