AMD Radeon R9 M370X Mac Edition vs Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 M370X Mac Edition and Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M370X Mac Edition

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 11 month(s) later
  • 3.9x more core clock speed: 775 MHz vs 200 MHz
  • 3.1x more texture fill rate: 32 GTexel / s vs 10.4 GTexel / s
  • 16x more pipelines: 640 vs 40
  • 9.8x better floating-point performance: 1,024 gflops vs 104.0 gflops
  • Around 31% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1548 vs 1180
  • Around 89% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9620 vs 5083
  • Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2862 vs 2095
  • Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2862 vs 2095
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 5 May 2015 vs 27 May 2013
Core clock speed 775 MHz vs 200 MHz
Texture fill rate 32 GTexel / s vs 10.4 GTexel / s
Pipelines 640 vs 40
Floating-point performance 1,024 gflops vs 104.0 gflops
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 1548 vs 1180
Geekbench - OpenCL 9620 vs 5083
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2862 vs 2095
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2862 vs 2095

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200

  • Around 63% higher boost clock speed: 1300 MHz vs 800 MHz
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 28 nm
  • Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 390 vs 350
  • Around 97% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3285 vs 1667
  • Around 97% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3285 vs 1667
Specifications (specs)
Boost clock speed 1300 MHz vs 800 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 22 nm vs 28 nm
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 390 vs 350
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3285 vs 1667
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3285 vs 1667

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M370X Mac Edition
GPU 2: Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
1548
1180
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
350
390
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
9620
5083
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2862
2095
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1667
3285
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2862
2095
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1667
3285
Name AMD Radeon R9 M370X Mac Edition Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200
PassMark - G3D Mark 1548 1180
PassMark - G2D Mark 350 390
Geekbench - OpenCL 9620 5083
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 25.151
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 516.994
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 2.321
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 32.932
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 111.138
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2862 2095
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1667 3285
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3326
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2862 2095
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1667 3285
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3326

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon R9 M370X Mac Edition Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200

Essentials

Architecture GCN 1.0 Generation 7.5
Code name Tropo Haswell GT3e
Launch date 5 May 2015 27 May 2013
Place in performance rating 1002 661
Type Desktop Laptop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 800 MHz 1300 MHz
Core clock speed 775 MHz 200 MHz
Floating-point performance 1,024 gflops 104.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 22 nm
Pipelines 640 40
Texture fill rate 32 GTexel / s 10.4 GTexel / s
Transistor count 1,500 million 392 million
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 30 Watt

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 1.0 x16
Laptop size medium sized

API support

DirectX 12.0 (11_1) 12.0 (11_1)
OpenGL 4.5 4.3

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 2 GB
Memory bandwidth 72 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 4500 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 eDRAM
Shared memory 1

Technologies

Quick Sync