AMD Radeon R9 M375 vs NVIDIA GeForce 940M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 M375 and NVIDIA GeForce 940M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M375

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 month(s) later
• Around 44% higher texture fill rate: 40.6 GTexel / s vs 28.22 GTexel / s
• Around 67% higher pipelines: 640 vs 384
• Around 44% better floating-point performance: 1,299 gflops vs 903.2 gflops
• 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
• Around 8% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 166 vs 153
• Around 77% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 10236 vs 5791
• Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 29.048 vs 25.98
• Around 62% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 272.547 vs 168.449
• Around 55% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.024 vs 1.307
• Around 65% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 35.994 vs 21.837
• Around 41% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 142.872 vs 101.399
• Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2227 vs 2132
• Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2227 vs 2132

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 940M

• Around 7% higher core clock speed: 1072 MHz vs 1000 MHz
• Around 16% higher boost clock speed: 1176 MHz vs 1015 MHz
• Around 64% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1100 MHz
• Around 15% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1123 vs 980
• Around 66% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3065 vs 1850
• Around 59% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 vs 2112
• Around 66% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3065 vs 1850
• Around 59% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 vs 2112

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M375
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 940M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	980 1123
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	166 153
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	10236 5791
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	29.048 25.98
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	272.547 168.449
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2.024 1.307
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	35.994 21.837
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	142.872 101.399
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2227 2132
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1850 3065
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2112 3357
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2227 2132
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1850 3065
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2112 3357

Compare specifications (specs)