Intel UHD Graphics 617 vs AMD Radeon R9 M375

Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 617 and AMD Radeon R9 M375 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

Intel UHD Graphics 617

AMD Radeon R9 M375

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 617

Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 6 month(s) later
Around 3% higher boost clock speed: 1050 MHz vs 1015 MHz
620.7x more texture fill rate: 25.20 GTexel/s vs 40.6 GTexel / s
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
Around 43% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 238 vs 166

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	7 November 2018 vs 5 May 2015
Boost clock speed	1050 MHz vs 1015 MHz
Texture fill rate	25.20 GTexel/s vs 40.6 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm vs 28 nm
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	238 vs 166

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M375

3.3x more core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 300 MHz
26.7x more pipelines: 640 vs 24
3.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 10236 vs 3303
Around 70% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2227 vs 1313
Around 70% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2227 vs 1313
Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1850 vs 1461
Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1850 vs 1461
Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2112 vs 1633
Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2112 vs 1633
Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 980 vs 898

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	1000 MHz vs 300 MHz
Pipelines	640 vs 24
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL	10236 vs 3303
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	2227 vs 1313
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	2227 vs 1313
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1850 vs 1461
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1850 vs 1461
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	2112 vs 1633
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	2112 vs 1633
PassMark - G3D Mark	980 vs 898

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 617
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 M375

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

3303

10236

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1313

2227

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1313

2227

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1461

1850

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1461

1850

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1633

2112

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1633

2112

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

238

166

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

898

980

Name	Intel UHD Graphics 617	AMD Radeon R9 M375
Geekbench - OpenCL	3303	10236
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1313	2227
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1313	2227
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1461	1850
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1461	1850
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	1633	2112
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	1633	2112
PassMark - G2D Mark	238	166
PassMark - G3D Mark	898	980
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		29.048
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		272.547
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		2.024
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		35.994
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		142.872

Compare specifications (specs)

	Intel UHD Graphics 617	AMD Radeon R9 M375
Essentials
Architecture	Generation 9.5	GCN 1.0
Code name	Amber Lake GT2	Tropo
Launch date	7 November 2018	5 May 2015
Place in performance rating	1218	1221
Type	Laptop	Desktop
Design		AMD Radeon R9 300 Series
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1050 MHz	1015 MHz
Core clock speed	300 MHz	1000 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	100.8 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	806.4 GFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	403.2 GFLOPS
Pipelines	24	640
Pixel fill rate	3.150 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	25.20 GTexel/s	40.6 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt
Compute units		10
Floating-point performance		1,299 gflops
Transistor count		1,500 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Eyefinity
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x1	PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus support		PCIe 3.0
Laptop size		medium sized
API support
DirectX	12	12
OpenCL	2.1	Not Listed
OpenGL	4.6	4.4
Shader Model	6.4
Vulkan
Mantle
Memory
Memory bus width	64 / 128 Bit	128 bit
Memory type	DDR3L / LPDDR3	DDR3
Maximum RAM amount		4 GB
Memory bandwidth		28.8 GB / s
Memory clock speed		1100 MHz
Shared memory		0
Technologies
AMD Eyefinity
AppAcceleration
DualGraphics
Enduro
FreeSync
HD3D
PowerTune
Switchable graphics
ZeroCore