AMD Radeon R9 M375 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 M375 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M375
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- 2.7x more pipelines: 640 vs 240
- Around 93% better floating-point performance: 1,299 gflops vs 673.9 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 55 nm
- 4.6x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 896 MB
- 2.5x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 161 vs 65
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 5 May 2015 vs 15 January 2009 |
| Pipelines | 640 vs 240 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,299 gflops vs 673.9 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 55 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 896 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 161 vs 65 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275
- Around 40% higher core clock speed: 1404 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- Around 25% higher texture fill rate: 50.6 billion / sec vs 40.6 GTexel / s
- Around 3% higher memory clock speed: 1134 MHz vs 1100 MHz
- Around 42% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1384 vs 973
- 2.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 23256 vs 10235
- Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3195 vs 2112
- Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3195 vs 2112
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1404 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 50.6 billion / sec vs 40.6 GTexel / s |
| Memory clock speed | 1134 MHz vs 1100 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1384 vs 973 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 23256 vs 10235 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3195 vs 2112 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3195 vs 2112 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M375
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon R9 M375 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 973 | 1384 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 161 | 65 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 10235 | 23256 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 29.048 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 272.547 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.024 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 35.994 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 142.872 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2227 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1850 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2112 | 3195 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2227 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1850 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2112 | 3195 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon R9 M375 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Tesla 2.0 |
| Code name | Tropo | GT200B |
| Design | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series | |
| Launch date | 5 May 2015 | 15 January 2009 |
| Place in performance rating | 1231 | 1234 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $249 | |
| Price now | $119.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 13.43 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1015 MHz | |
| Compute units | 10 | |
| Core clock speed | 1000 MHz | 1404 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 1,299 gflops | 673.9 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Pipelines | 640 | 240 |
| Texture fill rate | 40.6 GTexel / s | 50.6 billion / sec |
| Transistor count | 1,500 million | 1,400 million |
| CUDA cores | 240 | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 219 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | Two Dual Link DVI, 2x DVI |
| Eyefinity | ||
| Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | PCI-E 2.0 |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
| SLI options | 2-way3-way | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 10.0 |
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | Not Listed | |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 3.0 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 896 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB / s | 127.0 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 448 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1100 MHz | 1134 MHz |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| DualGraphics | ||
| Enduro | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| HD3D | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| Switchable graphics | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| CUDA | ||
| SLI | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon R9 M375 with others
AMDRadeon R9 M375 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 275
AMDRadeon R9 M375 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 460M
AMDRadeon R9 M375 vs
AMDRadeon HD 6370M
AMDRadeon R9 M375 vs
AMDRadeon R7 M260X
AMDRadeon R9 M375 vs
AMDRadeon R7 M460
AMDRadeon R9 M375 vs
IntelUHD Graphics 630
