AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop) vs NVIDIA Quadro K1200
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop) and NVIDIA Quadro K1200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 7% higher boost clock speed: 1206 MHz vs 1124 MHz
- 4.3x more texture fill rate: 154.4 GTexel / s vs 35.97 GTexel / s
- 4x more pipelines: 2048 vs 512
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 32% higher memory clock speed: 6600 MHz vs 5000 MHz
- 2.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7965 vs 2952
- Around 25% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 723 vs 578
- 3.8x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 33787 vs 8820
- 3.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 111.543 vs 31.949
- 3.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1817.005 vs 466.139
- 3.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 9.511 vs 2.629
- 3.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 99.875 vs 25.411
- 4.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 511.362 vs 117.722
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9983 vs 4080
- Around 42% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2443 vs 1721
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9983 vs 4080
- Around 42% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2443 vs 1721
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 4 August 2016 vs 28 January 2015 |
Boost clock speed | 1206 MHz vs 1124 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 154.4 GTexel / s vs 35.97 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2048 vs 512 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Memory clock speed | 6600 MHz vs 5000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7965 vs 2952 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 723 vs 578 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 33787 vs 8820 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 111.543 vs 31.949 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1817.005 vs 466.139 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 9.511 vs 2.629 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 99.875 vs 25.411 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 511.362 vs 117.722 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9983 vs 4080 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2443 vs 1721 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9983 vs 4080 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2443 vs 1721 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K1200
- Around 14% higher core clock speed: 1058 MHz vs 926 MHz
- 234.9x better floating-point performance: 1,151 gflops vs 4.9 TFLOPs
- 2.7x lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 120 Watt
- Around 96% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3288 vs 1674
- Around 96% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3288 vs 1674
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1058 MHz vs 926 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,151 gflops vs 4.9 TFLOPs |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt vs 120 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3288 vs 1674 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3288 vs 1674 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop)
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K1200
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop) | NVIDIA Quadro K1200 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7965 | 2952 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 723 | 578 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 33787 | 8820 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 111.543 | 31.949 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1817.005 | 466.139 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 9.511 | 2.629 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 99.875 | 25.411 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 511.362 | 117.722 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9983 | 4080 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2443 | 1721 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1674 | 3288 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9983 | 4080 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2443 | 1721 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1674 | 3288 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 842 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop) | NVIDIA Quadro K1200 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Maxwell |
Code name | Ellesmere | GM107 |
Design | Radeon RX 400 Series | |
GCN generation | 4th Gen | |
Launch date | 4 August 2016 | 28 January 2015 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $179 | $321.97 |
Place in performance rating | 389 | 798 |
Price now | $109.99 | $289.99 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Value for money (0-100) | 100.00 | 13.00 |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1206 MHz | 1124 MHz |
Compute units | 32 | |
Core clock speed | 926 MHz | 1058 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 4.9 TFLOPs | 1,151 gflops |
GPU Power | 85-110 Watt | |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 2048 | 512 |
Stream Processors | 2048 | |
Texture fill rate | 154.4 GTexel / s | 35.97 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | 45 Watt |
Transistor count | 5,700 million | 1,870 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 4x mini-DisplayPort, mDP mDP mDP mDP |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Number of simultaneous displays | 4 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 241 mm | 160 mm |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 450 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
Width | 1" (2.5 cm) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Shader Model | 5 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 211 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6600 MHz | 5000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | 128 Bit |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
CrossFire | ||
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 2.0b | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
PowerTune | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
ZeroCore | ||
3D Vision Pro | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Desktop Management |