AMD Radeon RX 560 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 340 OEM
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 560 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 340 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 560
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 98% higher core clock speed: 1090-1175 MHz vs 550 MHz
- 4636.4x more texture fill rate: 81.60 GTexel/s vs 17.6 GTexel / s
- 10.7x more pipelines: 1024 vs 96
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
- 4.1x more memory clock speed: 7000 MHz vs 1700 MHz
- 4.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3647 vs 738
- 2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 494 vs 242
- 5.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 57671 vs 11231
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 18 April 2017 vs 2 February 2010 |
Core clock speed | 1090-1175 MHz vs 550 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 81.60 GTexel/s vs 17.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1024 vs 96 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 40 nm |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 1 GB |
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz vs 1700 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3647 vs 738 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 494 vs 242 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 57671 vs 11231 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 340 OEM
- 99x better floating-point performance: 257.28 gflops vs 2.6 TFLOPs
- Around 16% lower typical power consumption: 69 Watt vs 60-80 Watt
- Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3974 vs 3352
- Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3974 vs 3352
Specifications (specs) | |
Floating-point performance | 257.28 gflops vs 2.6 TFLOPs |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 69 Watt vs 60-80 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3974 vs 3352 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3974 vs 3352 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 560
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 340 OEM
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 560 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 340 OEM |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3647 | 738 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 494 | 242 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 57671 | 11231 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 56.81 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 775.281 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.602 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 64.428 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 257.062 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6571 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3688 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 | 3974 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6571 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3688 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 | 3974 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1803 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 560 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 340 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | Polaris 21 | GT215 |
Design | Radeon RX 500 Series | |
GCN generation | 4th Gen | |
Launch date | 18 April 2017 | 2 February 2010 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $99 | |
Place in performance rating | 522 | 957 |
Price now | $104.99 | |
Type | Desktop, Laptop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 54.35 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1200-1275 MHz | |
Compute units | 14/16 | |
Core clock speed | 1090-1175 MHz | 550 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2.6 TFLOPs | 257.28 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 1024 | 96 |
Pixel fill rate | 20.40 GP/s | |
Render output units | 16 | |
Stream Processors | 896/1024 | |
Texture fill rate | 81.60 GTexel/s | 17.6 GTexel / s |
Texture Units | 64 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60-80 Watt | 69 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,000 million | 727 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 170 mm | 168 mm |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 450 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 10.1 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 112 GB/s | 27.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz | 1700 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
CrossFire | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
LiquidVR | ||
PowerTune | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) |