AMD Radeon RX 570 vs NVIDIA Quadro P4000
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 570 and NVIDIA Quadro P4000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 570
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
- 960.4x more texture fill rate: 159.23 GTexel/s vs 165.8 GTexel / s
- Around 14% higher pipelines: 2048 vs 1792
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 16 nm
- Around 72% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 79.029 vs 45.977
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 18 April 2017 vs 6 February 2017 |
| Texture fill rate | 159.23 GTexel/s vs 165.8 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2048 vs 1792 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 16 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 79.029 vs 45.977 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P4000
- Around 30% higher core clock speed: 1202 MHz vs 926-1168 MHz
- Around 23% higher boost clock speed: 1480 MHz vs 1206-1244 MHz
- 1040x better floating-point performance: 5,304 gflops vs 5.1 TFLOPs
- Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 150 Watt
- Around 9% higher memory clock speed: 7604 MHz vs 7000 MHz
- Around 66% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 11545 vs 6967
- Around 27% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 795 vs 626
- Around 17% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 42289 vs 36107
- Around 44% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 152.325 vs 105.688
- Around 47% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1590.392 vs 1083.926
- Around 38% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 11.365 vs 8.251
- Around 45% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 751.626 vs 520.089
- Around 66% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 15267 vs 9172
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3714 vs 3624
- Around 66% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 15267 vs 9172
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3714 vs 3624
- Around 27% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1115 vs 880
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1202 MHz vs 926-1168 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1480 MHz vs 1206-1244 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 5,304 gflops vs 5.1 TFLOPs |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt vs 150 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 7604 MHz vs 7000 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 11545 vs 6967 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 795 vs 626 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 42289 vs 36107 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 152.325 vs 105.688 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1590.392 vs 1083.926 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 11.365 vs 8.251 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 751.626 vs 520.089 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15267 vs 9172 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 vs 3624 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3346 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15267 vs 9172 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 vs 3624 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3346 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1115 vs 880 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 570
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P4000
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon RX 570 | NVIDIA Quadro P4000 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6967 | 11545 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 626 | 795 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 36107 | 42289 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 105.688 | 152.325 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1083.926 | 1590.392 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.251 | 11.365 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 79.029 | 45.977 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 520.089 | 751.626 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9172 | 15267 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3624 | 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 | 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9172 | 15267 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3624 | 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 | 3358 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 880 | 1115 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon RX 570 | NVIDIA Quadro P4000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Pascal |
| Code name | Polaris 20 | GP104 |
| Design | Radeon RX 500 Series | |
| GCN generation | 4th Gen | |
| Launch date | 18 April 2017 | 6 February 2017 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $169 | $815 |
| Place in performance rating | 405 | 287 |
| Price now | $149.99 | $799.99 |
| Type | Desktop, Laptop | Workstation |
| Value for money (0-100) | 59.00 | 17.17 |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1206-1244 MHz | 1480 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 926-1168 MHz | 1202 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 5.1 TFLOPs | 5,304 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 16 nm |
| Pipelines | 2048 | 1792 |
| Pixel fill rate | 39.81 GP/s | |
| Render output units | 32 | |
| Stream Processors | 2048 | |
| Texture fill rate | 159.23 GTexel/s | 165.8 GTexel / s |
| Texture Units | 128 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Transistor count | 5,700 million | 7,200 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 4x DisplayPort |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
| Display Port | 1.4 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 241 mm | 241 mm |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 450 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | 1x 6-pin |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
| Shader Model | 5.1 | |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 192 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz | 7604 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 4K H264 Decode | ||
| 4K H264 Encode | ||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
| AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| H265/HEVC Encode | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
| 3D Stereo | ||
| Mosaic | ||
| nView Display Management | ||
| Optimus | ||
