AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT vs NVIDIA Quadro K510M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT and NVIDIA Quadro K510M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT

NVIDIA Quadro K510M

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT

Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 11 month(s) later
Around 90% higher core clock speed: 1605 MHz vs 846 MHz
22.5x more texture fill rate: 304.8 GT/s vs 13.54 GTexel / s
8x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 1 GB
26x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 16667 vs 641
2.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 927 vs 441
13.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 14699 vs 1087
Around 85% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3720 vs 2012
Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3369 vs 3071
13.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 14699 vs 1087
Around 85% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3720 vs 2012
Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3369 vs 3071

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	7 July 2019 vs 23 July 2013
Core clock speed	1605 MHz vs 846 MHz
Texture fill rate	304.8 GT/s vs 13.54 GTexel / s
Maximum memory size	8 GB vs 1 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	16667 vs 641
PassMark - G2D Mark	927 vs 441
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	14699 vs 1087
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3720 vs 2012
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3369 vs 3071
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	14699 vs 1087
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3720 vs 2012
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3369 vs 3071

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K510M

7.5x lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 225 Watt

Thermal Design Power (TDP)	30 Watt vs 225 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K510M

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

16667

641

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

927

441

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

14699

1087

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3720

2012

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3369

3071

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

14699

1087

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3720

2012

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3369

3071

Name	AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT	NVIDIA Quadro K510M
PassMark - G3D Mark	16667	641
PassMark - G2D Mark	927	441
Geekbench - OpenCL	77153
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	252.601
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	3949.565
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	24.769
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	254.777
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	1322.129
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	14699	1087
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3720	2012
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3369	3071
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	14699	1087
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3720	2012
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3369	3071
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	9486

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT	NVIDIA Quadro K510M
Essentials
Architecture	RDNA	Kepler 2.0
Code name	Navi 10	GK208
Launch date	7 July 2019	23 July 2013
Launch price (MSRP)	$400
Place in performance rating	148	834
Type	Desktop	Mobile workstation
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1905 MHz
Compute units	40
Core clock speed	1605 MHz	846 MHz
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	19.51 TFLOPs
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	9.75 TFLOPs
Pixel fill rate	121.9 GP/s
Render output units	64
Stream Processors	2560
Texture fill rate	304.8 GT/s	13.54 GTexel / s
Texture Units	160
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	225 Watt	30 Watt
Transistor count	10.3 B	1270 Million
Floating-point performance		324.9 gflops
Manufacturing process technology		28 nm
Pipelines		192
Video outputs and ports
DisplayPort support
HDMI
Display Connectors		No outputs
Display Port		1.2
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Recommended system power (PSU)	600 Watt
Supplementary power connectors	1 x 8-pin and 1x6 pin
Interface		MXM-A (3.0)
Laptop size		medium sized
API support
DirectX	12	12
Vulkan
OpenGL		4.5
Shader Model		5
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	1 GB
Memory bandwidth	448 GB/s	19.2 GB / s
Memory bus width	256 bit	64 Bit
Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Memory clock speed		2400 MHz
Shared memory		0
Technologies
4K H264 Decode
4K H264 Encode
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready
FreeSync
H265/HEVC Decode
H265/HEVC Encode
HDMI 4K Support
TrueAudio
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR)
VR Ready
3D Vision Pro
Mosaic
nView Display Management
Optimus