AMD Radeon RX 590 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 590 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

AMD Radeon RX 590

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 590

Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 8 month(s) later
Around 44% higher core clock speed: 1469 MHz vs 1020 MHz
Around 42% higher boost clock speed: 1545 MHz vs 1085 MHz
5126.3x more texture fill rate: 222.48 GTexel/s vs 43.4 GTexel / s
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
4x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 2 GB
1600x more memory clock speed: 8000 MHz vs 5.4 GB/s
2.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9374 vs 3901
Around 51% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 789 vs 521
4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 45591 vs 11526
3.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 137.469 vs 42.463
3.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2083.862 vs 642.715
4.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 12.352 vs 2.933
5.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 139.477 vs 26.532
5.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 762.142 vs 133.458
2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 13383 vs 4843
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3716 vs 3683
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 vs 3329
2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 13383 vs 4843
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3716 vs 3683
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 vs 3329
9.2x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1081 vs 117

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	15 November 2018 vs 18 February 2014
Core clock speed	1469 MHz vs 1020 MHz
Boost clock speed	1545 MHz vs 1085 MHz
Texture fill rate	222.48 GTexel/s vs 43.4 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm vs 28 nm
Maximum memory size	8 GB vs 2 GB
Memory clock speed	8000 MHz vs 5.4 GB/s
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	9374 vs 3901
PassMark - G2D Mark	789 vs 521
Geekbench - OpenCL	45591 vs 11526
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	137.469 vs 42.463
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	2083.862 vs 642.715
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	12.352 vs 2.933
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	139.477 vs 26.532
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	762.142 vs 133.458
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	13383 vs 4843
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3716 vs 3683
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3359 vs 3329
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	13383 vs 4843
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3716 vs 3683
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3359 vs 3329
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	1081 vs 117

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

195.6x better floating-point performance: 1,389 gflops vs 7.1 TFLOPs
2.9x lower typical power consumption: 60 Watt vs 175 Watt

Floating-point performance	1,389 gflops vs 7.1 TFLOPs
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	60 Watt vs 175 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 590
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

9374

3901

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

789

521

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

45591

11526

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

137.469

42.463

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2083.862

642.715

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

12.352

2.933

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

139.477

26.532

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

762.142

133.458

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

13383

4843

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3716

3683

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3359

3329

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

13383

4843

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3716

3683

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3359

3329

3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score

GPU 1

GPU 2

1081

117

Name	AMD Radeon RX 590	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
PassMark - G3D Mark	9374	3901
PassMark - G2D Mark	789	521
Geekbench - OpenCL	45591	11526
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	137.469	42.463
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	2083.862	642.715
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	12.352	2.933
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	139.477	26.532
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	762.142	133.458
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	13383	4843
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3716	3683
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3359	3329
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	13383	4843
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3716	3683
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3359	3329
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	1081	117

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon RX 590	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
Essentials
Architecture	GCN 4.0	Maxwell
Code name	Polaris 30	GM107
Design	Radeon RX 500 Series
Launch date	15 November 2018	18 February 2014
Launch price (MSRP)	$279	$149
Place in performance rating	280	707
Type	Desktop	Desktop
Price now		$299.01
Value for money (0-100)		15.02
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1545 MHz	1085 MHz
Compute units	36
Core clock speed	1469 MHz	1020 MHz
Floating-point performance	7.1 TFLOPs	1,389 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	28 nm
Pixel fill rate	49.54 GP/s
Render output units	32
Stream Processors	2304
Texture fill rate	222.48 GTexel/s	43.4 GTexel / s
Texture Units	144
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	175 Watt	60 Watt
Transistor count	5,700 million	1,870 million
CUDA cores		640
Pipelines		640
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort	2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One mini...
DisplayPort support
Dual-link DVI support
HDMI
VGA
Audio input for HDMI		Internal
G-SYNC support
HDCP
Maximum VGA resolution		2048x1536
Multi monitor support
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	241 mm	5.7" (14.5 cm)
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin	None
Bus support		PCI Express 3.0
Height		4.376" (11.1 cm)
API support
DirectX	12.0 (12_0)	12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.5	4.4
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	2 GB
Memory bandwidth	256 GB/s	86.4 GB / s
Memory bus width	256 bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	8000 MHz	5.4 GB/s
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Shared memory		0
Technologies
4K H264 Decode
4K H264 Encode
H265/HEVC Decode
H265/HEVC Encode
HDMI 4K Support
3D Gaming
3D Vision
3D Vision Live
Adaptive VSync
Blu Ray 3D
CUDA
FXAA
GeForce Experience
GPU Boost
TXAA