AMD Radeon RX 640 vs NVIDIA GeForce 830A
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 640 and NVIDIA GeForce 830A videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 640
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 6% higher boost clock speed: 1218 MHz vs 1150 MHz
- 2118.5x more texture fill rate: 38.98 GTexel/s vs 18.4 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 512 vs 256
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 86% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3278 vs 1767
- Around 86% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3278 vs 1767
- 2.7x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11459 vs 4315
- Around 78% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2116 vs 1188
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 13 May 2019 vs 22 July 2014 |
| Boost clock speed | 1218 MHz vs 1150 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 38.98 GTexel/s vs 18.4 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 512 vs 256 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3278 vs 1767 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3278 vs 1767 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 11459 vs 4315 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2116 vs 1188 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 830A
- Around 52% lower typical power consumption: 33 Watt vs 50 Watt
- Around 3% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1750 MHz (7000 MHz effective)
- Around 63% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2889 vs 1769
- Around 63% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2889 vs 1769
- Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3302 vs 2775
- Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3302 vs 2775
- Around 16% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 407 vs 352
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt vs 50 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 1750 MHz (7000 MHz effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2889 vs 1769 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2889 vs 1769 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3302 vs 2775 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3302 vs 2775 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 407 vs 352 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 640
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 830A
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon RX 640 | NVIDIA GeForce 830A |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1769 | 2889 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1769 | 2889 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2775 | 3302 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2775 | 3302 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3278 | 1767 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3278 | 1767 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 11459 | 4315 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 352 | 407 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2116 | 1188 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon RX 640 | NVIDIA GeForce 830A | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Maxwell |
| Code name | Arctic Islands | GM108 |
| Launch date | 13 May 2019 | 22 July 2014 |
| Place in performance rating | 802 | 800 |
| Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1218 MHz | 1150 MHz |
| Compute units | 8 | |
| Core clock speed | 1082 MHz | 1082 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 77.95 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1247 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1247 GFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 512 | 256 |
| Pixel fill rate | 19.49 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 38.98 GTexel/s | 18.4 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 33 Watt |
| Transistor count | 2200 million | |
| Floating-point performance | 588.8 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Length | 5.7 inches (145 mm) | |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Width | Dual-slot | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 112.0 GB/s | 14.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (7000 MHz effective) | 1800 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Technologies |
||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon RX 640 with others
AMDRadeon RX 640 vs
ATIRadeon HD 4250
AMDRadeon RX 640 vs
NVIDIAQuadro K2200
AMDRadeon RX 640 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 830A
AMDRadeon RX 640 vs
IntelIris Pro Graphics 6200
AMDRadeon RX 640 vs
NVIDIAQuadro K1200
AMDRadeon RX 640 vs
NVIDIAQuadro P500
