AMD Radeon RX 640 vs AMD Radeon Pro 555X
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 640 and AMD Radeon Pro 555X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 640
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
- Around 19% higher core clock speed: 1082 MHz vs 907 MHz
- Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 75 Watt
Launch date | 13 May 2019 vs 16 July 2018 |
Core clock speed | 1082 MHz vs 907 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 555X
- Around 50% higher pipelines: 768 vs 512
- 2.9x more memory clock speed: 5100 MHz vs 1750 MHz (7000 MHz effective)
- Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2350 vs 1769
- Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2350 vs 1769
- Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3351 vs 2775
- Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3351 vs 2775
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4093 vs 3278
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4093 vs 3278
- Around 20% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 12518 vs 10390
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 768 vs 512 |
Memory clock speed | 5100 MHz vs 1750 MHz (7000 MHz effective) |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2350 vs 1769 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2350 vs 1769 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 vs 2775 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 vs 2775 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4093 vs 3278 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4093 vs 3278 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 12518 vs 10390 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 640
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro 555X
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 640 | AMD Radeon Pro 555X |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1769 | 2350 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1769 | 2350 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2775 | 3351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2775 | 3351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3278 | 4093 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3278 | 4093 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 10390 | 12518 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 337 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1936 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 35.283 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 668.308 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.158 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 49.593 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 170.952 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 640 | AMD Radeon Pro 555X | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 4.0 |
Code name | Arctic Islands | Polaris 21 |
Launch date | 13 May 2019 | 16 July 2018 |
Place in performance rating | 822 | 981 |
Type | Mobile workstation | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1218 MHz | |
Compute units | 8 | |
Core clock speed | 1082 MHz | 907 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 77.95 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1247 GFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1247 GFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 512 | 768 |
Pixel fill rate | 19.49 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 38.98 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 75 Watt |
Transistor count | 2200 million | 3,000 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
DisplayPort support | ||
HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Length | 5.7 inches (145 mm) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Width | Dual-slot | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 112.0 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (7000 MHz effective) | 5100 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) |