AMD Radeon RX 640 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop)
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 640 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 640
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- 193x more texture fill rate: 38.98 GTexel/s vs 202.0 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 16 nm
- 3x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 150 Watt
- 218.8x more memory clock speed: 1750 MHz (7000 MHz effective) vs 8 GB/s
| Launch date | 13 May 2019 vs 10 June 2016 |
| Texture fill rate | 38.98 GTexel/s vs 202.0 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 16 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 150 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (7000 MHz effective) vs 8 GB/s |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop)
- Around 39% higher core clock speed: 1506 MHz vs 1082 MHz
- Around 38% higher boost clock speed: 1683 MHz vs 1218 MHz
- 3.8x more pipelines: 1920 vs 512
- 4x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 2 GB
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3691 vs 1769
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3691 vs 1769
- Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3340 vs 2775
- Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3340 vs 2775
- 4.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 13765 vs 3278
- 4.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 13765 vs 3278
- 4.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 47476 vs 11683
- 2.4x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 847 vs 352
- 6.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 13504 vs 2142
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1506 MHz vs 1082 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1683 MHz vs 1218 MHz |
| Pipelines | 1920 vs 512 |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 2 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3691 vs 1769 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3691 vs 1769 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 vs 2775 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 vs 2775 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13765 vs 3278 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13765 vs 3278 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 47476 vs 11683 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 847 vs 352 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 13504 vs 2142 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 640
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop)
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon RX 640 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop) |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1769 | 3691 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1769 | 3691 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2775 | 3340 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2775 | 3340 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3278 | 13765 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3278 | 13765 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 11683 | 47476 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 352 | 847 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2142 | 13504 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 150.951 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1718.593 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 12.283 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 28.289 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 710.366 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1082 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon RX 640 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop) | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Pascal |
| Code name | Arctic Islands | GP104 |
| Launch date | 13 May 2019 | 10 June 2016 |
| Place in performance rating | 794 | 288 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $379 | |
| Price now | $359.99 | |
| Type | Desktop | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 45.72 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1218 MHz | 1683 MHz |
| Compute units | 8 | |
| Core clock speed | 1082 MHz | 1506 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 16 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 77.95 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1247 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1247 GFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 512 | 1920 |
| Pixel fill rate | 19.49 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 38.98 GTexel/s | 202.0 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Transistor count | 2200 million | 7,200 million |
| CUDA cores | 1920 | |
| Floating-point performance | 6,463 gflops | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 94 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, DP 1.42, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| HDMI | ||
| G-SYNC support | ||
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 5.7 inches (145 mm) | 10.5" (26.7 cm) |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 350 Watt | 500 Watt |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 8-pin |
| Width | Dual-slot | 2-slot |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 112.0 GB/s | 256 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (7000 MHz effective) | 8 GB/s |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Ansel | ||
| CUDA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| ShadowWorks | ||
| SLI | ||
| Virtual Reality | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon RX 640 with others
AMDRadeon RX 640 vs
ATIMobility Radeon X1700
AMDRadeon RX 640 vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 4650
AMDRadeon RX 640 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTS 160M
AMDRadeon RX 640 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 950M
AMDRadeon RX 640 vs
AMDRadeon E9260 PCIe
AMDRadeon RX 640 vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega 11
