AMD Radeon RX 640 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 640 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 640
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- 1146.5x more texture fill rate: 38.98 GTexel/s vs 34.0 billion / sec
- Around 14% higher pipelines: 512 vs 448
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
- 4.3x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 215 Watt
- Around 60% higher maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1280 MB
- Around 5% higher memory clock speed: 1750 MHz (7000 MHz effective) vs 1674 MHz (3348 data rate)
- Around 4% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11376 vs 10940
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 13 May 2019 vs 26 March 2010 |
| Texture fill rate | 38.98 GTexel/s vs 34.0 billion / sec |
| Pipelines | 512 vs 448 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 215 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1280 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (7000 MHz effective) vs 1674 MHz (3348 data rate) |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 11376 vs 10940 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470
- Around 12% higher core clock speed: 1215 MHz vs 1082 MHz
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3614 vs 1769
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3614 vs 1769
- Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3317 vs 2775
- Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3317 vs 2775
- Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3873 vs 3278
- Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3873 vs 3278
- Around 18% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 405 vs 342
- Around 54% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3107 vs 2017
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1215 MHz vs 1082 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3614 vs 1769 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3614 vs 1769 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3317 vs 2775 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3317 vs 2775 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3873 vs 3278 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3873 vs 3278 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 405 vs 342 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3107 vs 2017 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 640
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon RX 640 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470 |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1769 | 3614 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1769 | 3614 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2775 | 3317 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2775 | 3317 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3278 | 3873 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3278 | 3873 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 11376 | 10940 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 342 | 405 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2017 | 3107 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.93 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 980.005 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.268 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 47.309 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 97.852 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon RX 640 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Fermi |
| Code name | Arctic Islands | GF100 |
| Launch date | 13 May 2019 | 26 March 2010 |
| Place in performance rating | 808 | 810 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $349 | |
| Price now | $522.01 | |
| Type | Desktop | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 6.87 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1218 MHz | |
| Compute units | 8 | |
| Core clock speed | 1082 MHz | 1215 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 77.95 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1247 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1247 GFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 512 | 448 |
| Pixel fill rate | 19.49 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 38.98 GTexel/s | 34.0 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 215 Watt |
| Transistor count | 2200 million | 3,100 million |
| CUDA cores | 448 | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,088.6 gflops | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, Two Dual Link DVIMini HDMI |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 5.7 inches (145 mm) | 9.5" (241 mm) (24.1 cm) |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | Two 6-pins |
| Width | Dual-slot | |
| Bus support | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| SLI options | 2-way3-way | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.2 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1280 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 112.0 GB/s | 133.9 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 320 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (7000 MHz effective) | 1674 MHz (3348 data rate) |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DSR | ||
| SLI | ||
| Surround | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon RX 640 with others
AMDRadeon RX 640 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 6800 GT
AMDRadeon RX 640 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 470
AMDRadeon RX 640 vs
AMDRadeon HD 6450A
AMDRadeon RX 640 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7450M
AMDRadeon RX 640 vs
NVIDIAQuadro K5000M
AMDRadeon RX 640 vs
NVIDIAT600
