AMD Radeon RX 640 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 640 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 640
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 6% higher core clock speed: 1082 MHz vs 1020 MHz
- Around 12% higher boost clock speed: 1218 MHz vs 1085 MHz
- 898.2x more texture fill rate: 38.98 GTexel/s vs 43.4 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 20% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 60 Watt
- 350x more memory clock speed: 1750 MHz (7000 MHz effective) vs 5.4 GB/s
- Around 1% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11683 vs 11526
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 13 May 2019 vs 18 February 2014 |
| Core clock speed | 1082 MHz vs 1020 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1218 MHz vs 1085 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 38.98 GTexel/s vs 43.4 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 60 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (7000 MHz effective) vs 5.4 GB/s |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 11683 vs 11526 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
- Around 25% higher pipelines: 640 vs 512
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3683 vs 1769
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3683 vs 1769
- Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3329 vs 2775
- Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3329 vs 2775
- Around 48% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4843 vs 3278
- Around 48% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4843 vs 3278
- Around 48% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 521 vs 352
- Around 82% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3901 vs 2142
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 640 vs 512 |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3683 vs 1769 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3683 vs 1769 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3329 vs 2775 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3329 vs 2775 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4843 vs 3278 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4843 vs 3278 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 521 vs 352 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3901 vs 2142 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 640
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon RX 640 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1769 | 3683 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1769 | 3683 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2775 | 3329 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2775 | 3329 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3278 | 4843 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3278 | 4843 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 11683 | 11526 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 352 | 521 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2142 | 3901 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 42.463 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 642.715 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.933 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 26.532 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 133.458 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 117 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon RX 640 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Maxwell |
| Code name | Arctic Islands | GM107 |
| Launch date | 13 May 2019 | 18 February 2014 |
| Place in performance rating | 794 | 707 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $149 | |
| Price now | $299.01 | |
| Type | Desktop | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 15.02 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1218 MHz | 1085 MHz |
| Compute units | 8 | |
| Core clock speed | 1082 MHz | 1020 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 77.95 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1247 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1247 GFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 512 | 640 |
| Pixel fill rate | 19.49 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 38.98 GTexel/s | 43.4 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 60 Watt |
| Transistor count | 2200 million | 1,870 million |
| CUDA cores | 640 | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,389 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One mini... |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 5.7 inches (145 mm) | 5.7" (14.5 cm) |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Width | Dual-slot | |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 112.0 GB/s | 86.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (7000 MHz effective) | 5.4 GB/s |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision Live | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Blu Ray 3D | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon RX 640 with others
AMDRadeon RX 640 vs
ATIMobility Radeon X1700
AMDRadeon RX 640 vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 4650
AMDRadeon RX 640 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTS 160M
AMDRadeon RX 640 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 950M
AMDRadeon RX 640 vs
AMDRadeon E9260 PCIe
AMDRadeon RX 640 vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega 11
