AMD Radeon RX 640 vs NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 640 and NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 640
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 48% higher core clock speed: 1082 MHz vs 732 MHz
- 237.7x more texture fill rate: 38.98 GTexel/s vs 164.0 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 4.7x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 235 Watt
- Around 71% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1769 vs 1032
- Around 71% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1769 vs 1032
- Around 98% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 341 vs 172
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 13 May 2019 vs 12 November 2012 |
| Core clock speed | 1082 MHz vs 732 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 38.98 GTexel/s vs 164.0 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 235 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1769 vs 1032 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1769 vs 1032 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 341 vs 172 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm
- 5.3x more pipelines: 2688 vs 512
- 3x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 2 GB
- 3x more memory clock speed: 5200 MHz vs 1750 MHz (7000 MHz effective)
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 7038 vs 2775
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 7038 vs 2775
- Around 44% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 16581 vs 11546
- Around 46% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2918 vs 2003
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 2688 vs 512 |
| Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 2 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 5200 MHz vs 1750 MHz (7000 MHz effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 7038 vs 2775 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 7038 vs 2775 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 16581 vs 11546 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2918 vs 2003 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 640
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon RX 640 | NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1769 | 1032 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1769 | 1032 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2775 | 7038 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2775 | 7038 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3278 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3278 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 11546 | 16581 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 341 | 172 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2003 | 2918 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 49.455 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1666.354 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.836 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 92.472 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 275.229 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon RX 640 | NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Kepler |
| Code name | Arctic Islands | GK110 |
| Launch date | 13 May 2019 | 12 November 2012 |
| Place in performance rating | 807 | 808 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $7,699 | |
| Type | Workstation | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1218 MHz | |
| Compute units | 8 | |
| Core clock speed | 1082 MHz | 732 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 77.95 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1247 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1247 GFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 512 | 2688 |
| Pixel fill rate | 19.49 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 38.98 GTexel/s | 164.0 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 235 Watt |
| Transistor count | 2200 million | 7,080 million |
| Floating-point performance | 3,935 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 5.7 inches (145 mm) | 267 mm |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Width | Dual-slot | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 6 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 112.0 GB/s | 249.6 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (7000 MHz effective) | 5200 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon RX 640 with others
AMDRadeon RX 640 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 6800 GT
AMDRadeon RX 640 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 470
AMDRadeon RX 640 vs
AMDRadeon HD 6450A
AMDRadeon RX 640 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7450M
AMDRadeon RX 640 vs
NVIDIAQuadro K5000M
AMDRadeon RX 640 vs
NVIDIATesla K20Xm
