AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 71% higher core clock speed: 1968 MHz vs 1152 MHz
- Around 83% higher boost clock speed: 2589 MHz vs 1417 MHz
- 4872.1x more texture fill rate: 331.4 GTexel/s vs 68.02 GTexel / s
- 2.7x more pipelines: 2048 vs 768
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 14 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
- 3.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 16471 vs 5320
- 2.6x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 911 vs 345
- 4.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 82703 vs 19914
- 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 706.665 vs 293.638
- Around 92% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 15486 vs 8059
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3728 vs 3579
- Around 92% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 15486 vs 8059
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3728 vs 3579
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 30 Jul 2021 vs 3 January 2018 |
| Core clock speed | 1968 MHz vs 1152 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2589 MHz vs 1417 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 331.4 GTexel/s vs 68.02 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2048 vs 768 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 14 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 16471 vs 5320 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 911 vs 345 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 82703 vs 19914 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 706.665 vs 293.638 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15486 vs 8059 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3728 vs 3579 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3367 vs 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15486 vs 8059 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3728 vs 3579 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3367 vs 3358 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
- 2.1x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 160 Watt
- 3.5x more memory clock speed: 7008 MHz vs 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective)
- Around 23% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2219 vs 1804
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 160 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz vs 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2219 vs 1804 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 16471 | 5320 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 911 | 345 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 82703 | 19914 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 706.665 | 293.638 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15486 | 8059 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3728 | 3579 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3367 | 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15486 | 8059 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3728 | 3579 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3367 | 3358 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1804 | 2219 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 54.188 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1159.046 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.507 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 82.067 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Pascal |
| Code name | Navi 23 XT | GP107 |
| Launch date | 30 Jul 2021 | 3 January 2018 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $379 | |
| Place in performance rating | 191 | 505 |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 2589 MHz | 1417 MHz |
| Compute units | 32 | |
| Core clock speed | 1968 MHz | 1152 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 14 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 662.8 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 21.21 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 10.60 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 2048 | 768 |
| Pixel fill rate | 165.7 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 331.4 GTexel/s | 68.02 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 160 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Transistor count | 11060 million | 3,300 million |
| Floating-point performance | 2,177 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| DisplayPort count | 3 | |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| HDMI | ||
| G-SYNC support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | Dual-slot | |
| Height | 40 mm (1.6 inches) | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 190 mm (7.5 inches) | |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 450 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |
| Width | 110 mm (4.3 inches) | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 256 GB/s | 112.1 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) | 7008 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| Multi Monitor | ||
| Multi-Projection | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT with others
AMDRadeon RX 6600 XT vs
AMDRadeon HD 7670A
AMDRadeon RX 6600 XT vs
AMDRadeon Pro Duo
AMDRadeon RX 6600 XT vs
AMDRadeon Vega Frontier Edition
AMDRadeon RX 6600 XT vs
AMDRadeon RX 580X
AMDRadeon RX 6600 XT vs
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 Mobile
AMDRadeon RX 6600 XT vs
AMDRadeon Pro W6600M
